Experience beats confidence: a WVO-segmented model of flying fox conservation behaviour

Purpose This Behavioural Insight Report aims to generate behavioural insights for flying fox conservation by testing how self-efficacy, prior experience and knowledge predict conservation behaviour, and whether these relationships differ across wildlife value orientation (WVO) segments. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey of Sunshine Coast residents measured Domination–Mutualism via four belief dimensions (use, hunting, social affiliation and caring), alongside psychological constructs and behaviour. Data were analysed using PLS-SEM for the overall sample, with exploratory segment-level comparisons across WVO groups. Findings Experience emerged as the principal driver of conservation behaviour, knowledge showed a smaller positive effect and evidence for self-efficacy was tentative and should be interpreted cautiously given measurement limitations. Segment-level estimates were obtainable for two of the four WVO segments (Mutualists, Traditionalists). Experience was a significant positive predictor of behaviour in both groups; knowledge was additionally significant for Mutualists but not Traditionalists, while self-efficacy was significant (negative) for Traditionalists but not Mutualists. The Distanced and Pluralist segments could not be modelled due to collinearity among knowledge indicators within these smaller subgroups. Research limitations/implications The modest, region-specific sample and reliance on self-report, cross-sectional data limit causal inference and generalisability; the Distanced and Pluralist WVO segments could not be modelled due to collinearity among knowledge indicators within these smaller subgroups, and between-group differences have not been formally tested for statistical significance. Measures for some constructs would benefit from stronger theory anchoring and refinement. Practical implications Practitioners should prioritise experience-building tactics (seminars, workshops, volunteer activities) supported by targeted information; this is best evidenced for Mutualists and Traditionalists, as the Distanced and Pluralist segments could not be modelled and no segment-specific guidance is currently available for them. Originality/value This study applies WVO segmentation to flying fox conservation within a social marketing framework, identifying segment-level levers and highlighting the primacy of experience over self-efficacy in shaping behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Marketing
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-09-2025-0275
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience beats confidence: a WVO-segmented model of flying fox conservation behaviour

Jessica Harris, Liz Foote, Bo Pang, Bowen Shao
Journal of Social Marketing
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Experience beats confidence: a WVO-segmented model of flying fox conservation behaviour

Jessica Harris, Liz Foote, Bo Pang, Bowen Shao
article en

Abstract

Purpose This Behavioural Insight Report aims to generate behavioural insights for flying fox conservation by testing how self-efficacy, prior experience and knowledge predict conservation behaviour, and whether these relationships differ across wildlife value orientation (WVO) segments. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey of Sunshine Coast residents measured Domination–Mutualism via four belief dimensions (use, hunting, social affiliation and caring), alongside psychological constructs and behaviour. Data were analysed using PLS-SEM for the overall sample, with exploratory segment-level comparisons across WVO groups. Findings Experience emerged as the principal driver of conservation behaviour, knowledge showed a smaller positive effect and evidence for self-efficacy was tentative and should be interpreted cautiously given measurement limitations. Segment-level estimates were obtainable for two of the four WVO segments (Mutualists, Traditionalists). Experience was a significant positive predictor of behaviour in both groups; knowledge was additionally significant for Mutualists but not Traditionalists, while self-efficacy was significant (negative) for Traditionalists but not Mutualists. The Distanced and Pluralist segments could not be modelled due to collinearity among knowledge indicators within these smaller subgroups. Research limitations/implications The modest, region-specific sample and reliance on self-report, cross-sectional data limit causal inference and generalisability; the Distanced and Pluralist WVO segments could not be modelled due to collinearity among knowledge indicators within these smaller subgroups, and between-group differences have not been formally tested for statistical significance. Measures for some constructs would benefit from stronger theory anchoring and refinement. Practical implications Practitioners should prioritise experience-building tactics (seminars, workshops, volunteer activities) supported by targeted information; this is best evidenced for Mutualists and Traditionalists, as the Distanced and Pluralist segments could not be modelled and no segment-specific guidance is currently available for them. Originality/value This study applies WVO segmentation to flying fox conservation within a social marketing framework, identifying segment-level levers and highlighting the primacy of experience over self-efficacy in shaping behaviour.

Journal of Social Marketing
Griffith University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.