Public relations AI practices: Neoliberalism, field theory, and professional dispositions within an AI-mediated habitus

Public relations practitioners increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) bots and agentic systems to enhance decision-making, build campaigns, and support stakeholder research. The growth in AI use, however, reflects pressures of neoliberalism influencing everyday practice. Neoliberalism is an ideology that embodies market ideals and a sense of technological inevitability. Within neoliberalism, practitioners may believe they are exercising a degree of autonomy in decision-making, while actually navigating a field pre-structured by market logic and efficiency goals. This article leans on primary theorists Foucault and Bourdieu to explore these AI practices. Interviews with practitioners ( N = 22 ) indicated that neoliberal patterns actively circulate within practitioner AI deployments. They are made apparent in narratives around AI as compulsory to remain competitive, as a mode of self-optimization, and as an efficiency and productivity multiplier. Yet findings revealed the importance of field dispositions (e.g., professional judgment, context, responsibility) within practitioners’ neoliberal habitus. These dispositions reflect the need for a unified approach — fusing human oversight, responsible risk management, and formalized governance — that may bolster professional work. This article concludes that, amid the absence of regulatory frameworks, field dispositions serve an important, even necessary, role for public relations AI implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Inquiry
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x261499381
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public relations AI practices: Neoliberalism, field theory, and professional dispositions within an AI-mediated habitus

Kyle Harris
Public Relations Inquiry
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Public relations AI practices: Neoliberalism, field theory, and professional dispositions within an AI-mediated habitus

Kyle Harris
article en

Abstract

Public relations practitioners increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) bots and agentic systems to enhance decision-making, build campaigns, and support stakeholder research. The growth in AI use, however, reflects pressures of neoliberalism influencing everyday practice. Neoliberalism is an ideology that embodies market ideals and a sense of technological inevitability. Within neoliberalism, practitioners may believe they are exercising a degree of autonomy in decision-making, while actually navigating a field pre-structured by market logic and efficiency goals. This article leans on primary theorists Foucault and Bourdieu to explore these AI practices. Interviews with practitioners ( N = 22 ) indicated that neoliberal patterns actively circulate within practitioner AI deployments. They are made apparent in narratives around AI as compulsory to remain competitive, as a mode of self-optimization, and as an efficiency and productivity multiplier. Yet findings revealed the importance of field dispositions (e.g., professional judgment, context, responsibility) within practitioners’ neoliberal habitus. These dispositions reflect the need for a unified approach — fusing human oversight, responsible risk management, and formalized governance — that may bolster professional work. This article concludes that, amid the absence of regulatory frameworks, field dispositions serve an important, even necessary, role for public relations AI implementation.

Public Relations Inquiry
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.