An Observational Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence and Pregnancy Outcomes Before and During COVID-19 in the Australian Capital Territory, 2018–2021

Background: In the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing using the World Health Organization’s (WHO) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was replaced with temporary guidelines comprising two phases: the red phase, with fasting glucose ≥5.1 mmol/L (diagnosed) and <5.1 mmol/L (excluded); and the subsequent amber phase of screening with fasting ≥5.1 mmol/L (diagnosed), <4.7 mmol/L (excluded) and 4.7–5.0 mmol/L, requiring completion of an OGTT. Aims: Our aim was to determine whether there were differences in GDM prevalence, maternal characteristics or infant outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic period, in association with implementation of the temporary guidelines. Methods: We performed a before–during observational analysis of 9686 singleton births between April 2018 and December 2019 (pre-COVID-19, group 1, n = 4879) or April 2020 and December 2021 (COVID-19, group 2, n = 4807). Group 2 comprised subgroups 2a (1 April–2 November 2020, n = 1845) and 2b (3 November 2020–31 December 2021, n = 2962). The GDM testing date was estimated at 26 weeks of gestation and used for group assignment. For GDM diagnosis, group 1 applied the WHO OGTT, and group 2 applied the temporary guidelines (2a the red phase; 2b the amber phase). Associations were tested using chi-square tests, pairwise z-tests and logistic regression. Results: Compared to group 1, GDM prevalence significantly decreased in subgroup 2a (26.7% vs. 21.7%) and significantly increased in subgroup 2b (26.7% vs. 31.7%) (all: p < 0.001). For non-GDM pregnancies, there were no significant associations nor significant differences for infant outcomes when group 1 was compared to subgroups 2a and 2b. Subgroup 2a pregnancies with insulin-requiring GDM, compared to Group 1 counterparts, had significantly higher odds of infants with LGA (aOR = 1.73, 98.75% CI of 1.04–2.89, p = 0.008) and macrosomia (aOR = 2.05, 98.75% CI of 1.09–3.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions: The COVID-19 period and the temporary guidelines were associated with changes in GDM prevalence, which differed by phase. No increase was observed in adverse infant outcomes in non-GDM pregnancies. GDM pregnancies in the red phase had worse infant outcomes, which may have been due to enrichment of this group with elevated fasting GDM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetology
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology7100205
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Observational Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence and Pregnancy Outcomes Before and During COVID-19 in the Australian Capital Territory, 2018–2021

Deborah Lee Davis, Christopher James Nolan, Catherine Ruth Knight-Agarwal, Jennifer Hutchinson et al.
Diabetology
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

An Observational Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence and Pregnancy Outcomes Before and During COVID-19 in the Australian Capital Territory, 2018–2021

Deborah Lee Davis, Christopher James Nolan, Catherine Ruth Knight-Agarwal, Jennifer Hutchinson, Roisin Ashhurst, Matthew Hart
article en

Abstract

Background: In the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing using the World Health Organization’s (WHO) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was replaced with temporary guidelines comprising two phases: the red phase, with fasting glucose ≥5.1 mmol/L (diagnosed) and <5.1 mmol/L (excluded); and the subsequent amber phase of screening with fasting ≥5.1 mmol/L (diagnosed), <4.7 mmol/L (excluded) and 4.7–5.0 mmol/L, requiring completion of an OGTT. Aims: Our aim was to determine whether there were differences in GDM prevalence, maternal characteristics or infant outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic period, in association with implementation of the temporary guidelines. Methods: We performed a before–during observational analysis of 9686 singleton births between April 2018 and December 2019 (pre-COVID-19, group 1, n = 4879) or April 2020 and December 2021 (COVID-19, group 2, n = 4807). Group 2 comprised subgroups 2a (1 April–2 November 2020, n = 1845) and 2b (3 November 2020–31 December 2021, n = 2962). The GDM testing date was estimated at 26 weeks of gestation and used for group assignment. For GDM diagnosis, group 1 applied the WHO OGTT, and group 2 applied the temporary guidelines (2a the red phase; 2b the amber phase). Associations were tested using chi-square tests, pairwise z-tests and logistic regression. Results: Compared to group 1, GDM prevalence significantly decreased in subgroup 2a (26.7% vs. 21.7%) and significantly increased in subgroup 2b (26.7% vs. 31.7%) (all: p < 0.001). For non-GDM pregnancies, there were no significant associations nor significant differences for infant outcomes when group 1 was compared to subgroups 2a and 2b. Subgroup 2a pregnancies with insulin-requiring GDM, compared to Group 1 counterparts, had significantly higher odds of infants with LGA (aOR = 1.73, 98.75% CI of 1.04–2.89, p = 0.008) and macrosomia (aOR = 2.05, 98.75% CI of 1.09–3.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions: The COVID-19 period and the temporary guidelines were associated with changes in GDM prevalence, which differed by phase. No increase was observed in adverse infant outcomes in non-GDM pregnancies. GDM pregnancies in the red phase had worse infant outcomes, which may have been due to enrichment of this group with elevated fasting GDM.

DiabetologyVol. 7(10)
Australian National University (AU), University of Canberra (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.