Nontraditional Student Preferences and Experiences: Implications for Virtual Synchronous Sessions

As online and blended formats expand in continuing higher education, instructors and program leaders must consider how virtual synchronous sessions support adult and nontraditional learners who balance coursework with work, caregiving, and other responsibilities. In this study, virtual synchronous sessions refer to scheduled live web-conferencing meetings embedded in online or blended courses. This mixed-methods survey study examined nontraditional undergraduate and graduate students’ preferences, experiences, and perceived barriers related to these sessions at a private university in the southeastern United States primarily serving adult learners. A total of 119 completed responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and descriptive thematic analysis of open-ended comments. Findings indicated that students generally viewed virtual synchronous sessions as valuable when they were concise, purpose-driven, and focused on clarification, instructor interaction, and guided support. Flexibility emerged as especially important, with students expressing strong preferences for optional or mixed participation models and access to recordings when live attendance was not feasible. Reported barriers included work schedules, caregiving responsibilities, technology limitations, and limited access to quiet learning environments. Implications are discussed for aligning synchronous design decisions with course modality, participation expectations, equitable access, and instructor presence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2026.2748126
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nontraditional Student Preferences and Experiences: Implications for Virtual Synchronous Sessions

Jacqueline S. Stephen, Charlotte Whitehead
The Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Online and Blended Learning
article

Nontraditional Student Preferences and Experiences: Implications for Virtual Synchronous Sessions

Jacqueline S. Stephen, Charlotte Whitehead
article en

Abstract

As online and blended formats expand in continuing higher education, instructors and program leaders must consider how virtual synchronous sessions support adult and nontraditional learners who balance coursework with work, caregiving, and other responsibilities. In this study, virtual synchronous sessions refer to scheduled live web-conferencing meetings embedded in online or blended courses. This mixed-methods survey study examined nontraditional undergraduate and graduate students’ preferences, experiences, and perceived barriers related to these sessions at a private university in the southeastern United States primarily serving adult learners. A total of 119 completed responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and descriptive thematic analysis of open-ended comments. Findings indicated that students generally viewed virtual synchronous sessions as valuable when they were concise, purpose-driven, and focused on clarification, instructor interaction, and guided support. Flexibility emerged as especially important, with students expressing strong preferences for optional or mixed participation models and access to recordings when live attendance was not feasible. Reported barriers included work schedules, caregiving responsibilities, technology limitations, and limited access to quiet learning environments. Implications are discussed for aligning synchronous design decisions with course modality, participation expectations, equitable access, and instructor presence.

The Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.