Cost Effectiveness of Sertraline for Preventing Domestic Violence Reoffending Among Highly Impulsive Violent Offenders in Australia: A Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence generates significant health and justice costs, yet there is little trial-based clinical or economic evidence on pharmacological interventions for high-risk offenders. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of sertraline for reducing domestic violence reoffending among men with serious violent offending histories and high impulsivity. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to estimate the incremental cost per domestic violence reoffence prevented for sertraline compared with placebo from a government payer perspective over 24 months. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a 24-month, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in New South Wales, Australia, comparing sertraline (n = 319) with placebo (n = 311). Both randomised groups received identical clinical support. A prespecified non-randomised group (N-Rand; n = 166) included eligible men who did not proceed to randomisation. The primary economic outcome was incremental cost per domestic violence reoffence prevented from a government perspective. Uncertainty was characterised using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Domestic violence reoffending was lower with sertraline than placebo (28.2% vs 35.9%; risk ratio 0.79, p = 0.039) and N-Rand (42.2%; risk ratio 0.67, p = 0.002). Relative to placebo, sertraline generated net savings of Australian dollars (A$) 4443 per participant (A$57,636 per domestic violence reoffence prevented), with criminal justice savings (A$4839) exceeding medication costs (A$396). Relative to N-Rand, net savings were A$3327 per participant (A$23,841 per domestic violence reoffence prevented). In priobabilistic sensitivity analysis, sertraline (compared to placebo) had a mean incremental cost of -A$4507 (95% uncertainty interval -A$9,433, A$249) and 0.077 domestic violence reoffences prevented (95% confidence interval 0.004, 0.149). Sertraline was dominant in 95.1% of simulations, and in 84.9% versus N-Rand. CONCLUSIONS: Allocation to sertraline was associated with lower government costs and fewer domestic violence reoffences than placebo among men with serious violent offending histories and high impulsivity. Each reoffence prevented represents a reduction in violence experienced by victims, partners and children. These findings support consideration of sertraline as an adjunct within intervention and diversion programmes for high-risk offenders, where clinically indicated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12613000442707.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01080-0
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Effectiveness of Sertraline for Preventing Domestic Violence Reoffending Among Highly Impulsive Violent Offenders in Australia: A Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Emaediong Ibong Akpanekpo, Georgina Mary Chambers, Peter William Schofield, Tony Butler et al.
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Cost Effectiveness of Sertraline for Preventing Domestic Violence Reoffending Among Highly Impulsive Violent Offenders in Australia: A Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Emaediong Ibong Akpanekpo, Georgina Mary Chambers, Peter William Schofield, Tony Butler, Lee Knight
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence generates significant health and justice costs, yet there is little trial-based clinical or economic evidence on pharmacological interventions for high-risk offenders. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of sertraline for reducing domestic violence reoffending among men with serious violent offending histories and high impulsivity. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to estimate the incremental cost per domestic violence reoffence prevented for sertraline compared with placebo from a government payer perspective over 24 months. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a 24-month, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in New South Wales, Australia, comparing sertraline (n = 319) with placebo (n = 311). Both randomised groups received identical clinical support. A prespecified non-randomised group (N-Rand; n = 166) included eligible men who did not proceed to randomisation. The primary economic outcome was incremental cost per domestic violence reoffence prevented from a government perspective. Uncertainty was characterised using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Domestic violence reoffending was lower with sertraline than placebo (28.2% vs 35.9%; risk ratio 0.79, p = 0.039) and N-Rand (42.2%; risk ratio 0.67, p = 0.002). Relative to placebo, sertraline generated net savings of Australian dollars (A$) 4443 per participant (A$57,636 per domestic violence reoffence prevented), with criminal justice savings (A$4839) exceeding medication costs (A$396). Relative to N-Rand, net savings were A$3327 per participant (A$23,841 per domestic violence reoffence prevented). In priobabilistic sensitivity analysis, sertraline (compared to placebo) had a mean incremental cost of -A$4507 (95% uncertainty interval -A$9,433, A$249) and 0.077 domestic violence reoffences prevented (95% confidence interval 0.004, 0.149). Sertraline was dominant in 95.1% of simulations, and in 84.9% versus N-Rand. CONCLUSIONS: Allocation to sertraline was associated with lower government costs and fewer domestic violence reoffences than placebo among men with serious violent offending histories and high impulsivity. Each reoffence prevented represents a reduction in violence experienced by victims, partners and children. These findings support consideration of sertraline as an adjunct within intervention and diversion programmes for high-risk offenders, where clinically indicated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12613000442707.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
UNSW Sydney (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), Centre for Big Data Research in Health (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
University of New South Wales, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.