Measuring geographic proximity to family medicine and continuity of care in the last year of life: A population-level retrospective cohort study using Canadian health administrative data

BACKGROUND: Family physicians provide most outpatient care in patients' last year of life, but it remains unclear how geographic distance between patients and their physicians affects continuity of care. Patients living farther from care providers may experience reduced access and more fragmented care. This study examined whether geographic proximity to a family physician is associated with relational continuity of outpatient care in the last year of life. METHODS: We conducted a population‑level retrospective cohort study of adults who died in Ontario, Canada, from 2021 to 2024, using linked health administrative data. Geographic proximity was measured using quartiles of the shortest driving distance (km) between each patient's residence and their family physician's practice location. Relational continuity was assessed using established measures capturing the concentration of visits, dispersion of care across physicians, and the temporal regularity of visits. Associations were estimated using proportional‑odds regression models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. RESULTS: Among 400,499 patients, the mean age at death was 76.0 years, 52.2% were male, the mean (SD) distance to their family physician was 25.5 (92.0) km, with the highest quartile residing more than 14.2 km away from their family physician. Greater distance was associated with modestly lower relational continuity: each one-quartile increase in distance was linked to lower odds of higher continuity with the usual family physician (cOR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.87, 0.88). Sensitivity analyses using travel time and Euclidean distance produced consistent findings. DISCUSSION: Geographic proximity is a significant determinant of outpatient continuity near the end of life. Patients living farther from their family physicians experience more fragmented care, underscoring the need for system-level strategies to reduce geographic barriers, including improved local access to primary care and enhanced virtual-care models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360638
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring geographic proximity to family medicine and continuity of care in the last year of life: A population-level retrospective cohort study using Canadian health administrative data

Michelle Howard, Lawrence C. E. Mbuagbaw, Shuaib Hafid, Aaron Jones et al.
PLoS ONE
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Measuring geographic proximity to family medicine and continuity of care in the last year of life: A population-level retrospective cohort study using Canadian health administrative data

Michelle Howard, Lawrence C. E. Mbuagbaw, Shuaib Hafid, Aaron Jones, K. Bruce Newbold, Sarina Roslyn Isenberg, Peter Gozdyra, Ana Gayowsky, Erin Gallagher, Andrew Costa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family physicians provide most outpatient care in patients' last year of life, but it remains unclear how geographic distance between patients and their physicians affects continuity of care. Patients living farther from care providers may experience reduced access and more fragmented care. This study examined whether geographic proximity to a family physician is associated with relational continuity of outpatient care in the last year of life. METHODS: We conducted a population‑level retrospective cohort study of adults who died in Ontario, Canada, from 2021 to 2024, using linked health administrative data. Geographic proximity was measured using quartiles of the shortest driving distance (km) between each patient's residence and their family physician's practice location. Relational continuity was assessed using established measures capturing the concentration of visits, dispersion of care across physicians, and the temporal regularity of visits. Associations were estimated using proportional‑odds regression models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. RESULTS: Among 400,499 patients, the mean age at death was 76.0 years, 52.2% were male, the mean (SD) distance to their family physician was 25.5 (92.0) km, with the highest quartile residing more than 14.2 km away from their family physician. Greater distance was associated with modestly lower relational continuity: each one-quartile increase in distance was linked to lower odds of higher continuity with the usual family physician (cOR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.87, 0.88). Sensitivity analyses using travel time and Euclidean distance produced consistent findings. DISCUSSION: Geographic proximity is a significant determinant of outpatient continuity near the end of life. Patients living farther from their family physicians experience more fragmented care, underscoring the need for system-level strategies to reduce geographic barriers, including improved local access to primary care and enhanced virtual-care models.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of Ottawa (CA), Bruyere Health Research Institute (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.