Wheelchair Provision, Accessibility, and Independent Wheelchair Use in Albania: A Mixed-Methods Study

Appropriate wheelchairs are essential for mobility and participation, but their benefits depend on device suitability, user training, maintenance, and accessible environments. This mixed-methods study examined wheelchair provision, functionality, accessibility barriers, and factors associated with reported independent wheelchair use in Albania. Survey data from 807 respondents, including 662 wheelchair users and 145 family proxy respondents, were integrated with five focus group discussions involving 40 wheelchair users. The primary outcome was self- or proxy-reported independent wheelchair use, assessed using a single Yes/No questionnaire item. Among respondents with valid outcome data, 30.9% reported independent wheelchair use. Most wheelchairs were folding models (80.6% of respondents with valid wheelchair-type data). In the complete-case multivariable model (n = 538), wheelchair-use training (OR = 2.14, 95% CI [1.34, 3.42]), wheelchair functionality (OR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.14, 1.76]), ramp access (OR = 3.41, 95% CI [2.10, 5.54]), and male gender (OR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.38, 3.46]) were associated with independent use; maintenance services showed a smaller association (OR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.02, 2.40]). Sensitivity analyses, including multiple imputation and analyses restricted to direct respondents or the two predominant wheelchair types, supported the principal associations. The findings should be interpreted as sample-specific associations rather than causal or population-level estimates and support continued attention to structured wheelchair services, user training, and accessible environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Disabilities
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities6050083
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wheelchair Provision, Accessibility, and Independent Wheelchair Use in Albania: A Mixed-Methods Study

Blerta Cani Drenofci, Marinela Pane
Disabilities
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Wheelchair Provision, Accessibility, and Independent Wheelchair Use in Albania: A Mixed-Methods Study

Blerta Cani Drenofci, Marinela Pane
article en

Abstract

Appropriate wheelchairs are essential for mobility and participation, but their benefits depend on device suitability, user training, maintenance, and accessible environments. This mixed-methods study examined wheelchair provision, functionality, accessibility barriers, and factors associated with reported independent wheelchair use in Albania. Survey data from 807 respondents, including 662 wheelchair users and 145 family proxy respondents, were integrated with five focus group discussions involving 40 wheelchair users. The primary outcome was self- or proxy-reported independent wheelchair use, assessed using a single Yes/No questionnaire item. Among respondents with valid outcome data, 30.9% reported independent wheelchair use. Most wheelchairs were folding models (80.6% of respondents with valid wheelchair-type data). In the complete-case multivariable model (n = 538), wheelchair-use training (OR = 2.14, 95% CI [1.34, 3.42]), wheelchair functionality (OR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.14, 1.76]), ramp access (OR = 3.41, 95% CI [2.10, 5.54]), and male gender (OR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.38, 3.46]) were associated with independent use; maintenance services showed a smaller association (OR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.02, 2.40]). Sensitivity analyses, including multiple imputation and analyses restricted to direct respondents or the two predominant wheelchair types, supported the principal associations. The findings should be interpreted as sample-specific associations rather than causal or population-level estimates and support continued attention to structured wheelchair services, user training, and accessible environments.

DisabilitiesVol. 6(5)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.