Age-associated differences in lower-extremity muscle mass, force, and power in older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of sex differences

Abstract Background The decline in musculoskeletal function with aging is a key contributor to mobility impairments and loss of independence. While sarcopenia and dynapenia are well described, recent evidence highlights muscle power as a more sensitive indicator of functional deterioration. Aims This study aimed to compare age-associated differences in muscle mass, force, and lower-limb muscle power in older adults over different assessment methods, while accounting for sex-related differences. Methods Three hundred nineteen community-dwelling adults aged 60–97 years were assessed for muscle mass (DXA-derived lean mass, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index), muscle force (handgrip force, knee extension maximal isometric contraction), muscle moments and angular velocity (isokinetic dynamometry), and lower-limb muscle power (isokinetic testing and sit-to-stand power). Associations with age and sex were examined using regression models and ANOVA. Results Lower-limb muscle power showed a stronger negative association with age than muscle force or mass (β = − 0.433 vs. − 0.303 and − 0.119, respectively; p < 0.001). However, the present study could not determine whether muscle power begins to decline earlier than muscle force or mass. For several variables, age associations were stronger in males than in females, most consistently for lower-limb power, although these interactions were not systematically reproduced in age-stratified analyses. The strongest negative age associations were observed between 71 and 80 years, whereas fewer significant associations (only for handgrip) were observed after age 80. Conclusions Lower-limb muscle power appeared more sensitive to age-associated differences than muscle force or mass, supporting its role as a key biomarker of neuromuscular aging. This study also highlights that sex may contribute to variability in age-associated patterns of muscle power, raising questions about the universality of its definition that warrant further confirmation. These findings emphasize the clinical importance of including power assessments in strategies to preserve independence in older adults. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05343286, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05343286 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08274-0
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age-associated differences in lower-extremity muscle mass, force, and power in older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of sex differences

Serge S. Colson, Émeline Michel, Raphaël Zory, Frédéric Chorin et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Age-associated differences in lower-extremity muscle mass, force, and power in older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of sex differences

Serge S. Colson, Émeline Michel, Raphaël Zory, Frédéric Chorin, Élodie Piche, Olivier Guérin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The decline in musculoskeletal function with aging is a key contributor to mobility impairments and loss of independence. While sarcopenia and dynapenia are well described, recent evidence highlights muscle power as a more sensitive indicator of functional deterioration. Aims This study aimed to compare age-associated differences in muscle mass, force, and lower-limb muscle power in older adults over different assessment methods, while accounting for sex-related differences. Methods Three hundred nineteen community-dwelling adults aged 60–97 years were assessed for muscle mass (DXA-derived lean mass, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index), muscle force (handgrip force, knee extension maximal isometric contraction), muscle moments and angular velocity (isokinetic dynamometry), and lower-limb muscle power (isokinetic testing and sit-to-stand power). Associations with age and sex were examined using regression models and ANOVA. Results Lower-limb muscle power showed a stronger negative association with age than muscle force or mass (β = − 0.433 vs. − 0.303 and − 0.119, respectively; p < 0.001). However, the present study could not determine whether muscle power begins to decline earlier than muscle force or mass. For several variables, age associations were stronger in males than in females, most consistently for lower-limb power, although these interactions were not systematically reproduced in age-stratified analyses. The strongest negative age associations were observed between 71 and 80 years, whereas fewer significant associations (only for handgrip) were observed after age 80. Conclusions Lower-limb muscle power appeared more sensitive to age-associated differences than muscle force or mass, supporting its role as a key biomarker of neuromuscular aging. This study also highlights that sex may contribute to variability in age-associated patterns of muscle power, raising questions about the universality of its definition that warrant further confirmation. These findings emphasize the clinical importance of including power assessments in strategies to preserve independence in older adults. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05343286, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05343286 .

BMC Geriatrics
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement de Nice (FR), Laboratoire Motricité Humaine Éducation Sport Santé (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.