From diverse baselines to score convergence in cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge: a pre-post study on instructor-led training to healthcare professionals, medical students and laypeople

Abstract Background Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training is crucial, yet performance often remains suboptimal among both professionals and laypeople. While structured training improves skills and attitudes, traditional instructor-led sessions may be limited by subjective assessment of CPR quality. Aim To assess the acquisition of CPR knowledge after instructor-led certified training in healthcare professionals (HCP), medical students (MS) and laypeople (LP). Methods A single-arm pre-post quasi-experimental study was implemented involving three independent groups registered for certified Basic Life Support (BLS) training courses: HCP, MS and LP. All participants were asked to complete a 12-question anonymous questionnaire based on the American Heart Association guidelines for resuscitation, before and immediately after training. Knowledge gain was assessed by comparing pre- and post-training scores. Results The study included 285 participants. Theoretical knowledge improved significantly across all groups ( p < 0.001), with mean scores increasing from 80.35%±13.95% to 90.88% ±8.46%. While pre-test scores reflected baseline experience (HCP: 89.18%; MS: 80.34%; LP: 70.74%), post-test scores showed no statistically significant difference between groups ( p = 0.378), reflecting score convergence. Significant improvement was observed in the overall cohort, MS, and LP ( p < 0.001), whereas the improvement among HCP did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.055). Analysis of specific items may suggest a “theoretical-practical dissonance” in LP, who struggled with the conceptual recall of hand positioning and depth despite practical training. Conversely, HCPs showed only marginal improvement in the BLS algorithm, likely due to cognitive interference from more complex clinical workflows. Conclusion Instructor-led BLS training effectively equalizes theoretical knowledge across diverse backgrounds. However, the nature of knowledge acquisition may vary: novices benefit most from standardized algorithms, while experts may experience interference from advanced frameworks. Furthermore, in LP, practical proficiency may develop through muscle memory even when theoretical recall remains biased, suggesting that educational assessments should increasingly integrate both cognitive and procedural metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01404-w
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From diverse baselines to score convergence in cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge: a pre-post study on instructor-led training to healthcare professionals, medical students and laypeople

Inês Mariana Lourenço, Cristina Granja, Abel Nicolau, Inês Jorge et al.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

From diverse baselines to score convergence in cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge: a pre-post study on instructor-led training to healthcare professionals, medical students and laypeople

Inês Mariana Lourenço, Cristina Granja, Abel Nicolau, Inês Jorge, Gustavo Mendes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training is crucial, yet performance often remains suboptimal among both professionals and laypeople. While structured training improves skills and attitudes, traditional instructor-led sessions may be limited by subjective assessment of CPR quality. Aim To assess the acquisition of CPR knowledge after instructor-led certified training in healthcare professionals (HCP), medical students (MS) and laypeople (LP). Methods A single-arm pre-post quasi-experimental study was implemented involving three independent groups registered for certified Basic Life Support (BLS) training courses: HCP, MS and LP. All participants were asked to complete a 12-question anonymous questionnaire based on the American Heart Association guidelines for resuscitation, before and immediately after training. Knowledge gain was assessed by comparing pre- and post-training scores. Results The study included 285 participants. Theoretical knowledge improved significantly across all groups ( p < 0.001), with mean scores increasing from 80.35%±13.95% to 90.88% ±8.46%. While pre-test scores reflected baseline experience (HCP: 89.18%; MS: 80.34%; LP: 70.74%), post-test scores showed no statistically significant difference between groups ( p = 0.378), reflecting score convergence. Significant improvement was observed in the overall cohort, MS, and LP ( p < 0.001), whereas the improvement among HCP did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.055). Analysis of specific items may suggest a “theoretical-practical dissonance” in LP, who struggled with the conceptual recall of hand positioning and depth despite practical training. Conversely, HCPs showed only marginal improvement in the BLS algorithm, likely due to cognitive interference from more complex clinical workflows. Conclusion Instructor-led BLS training effectively equalizes theoretical knowledge across diverse backgrounds. However, the nature of knowledge acquisition may vary: novices benefit most from standardized algorithms, while experts may experience interference from advanced frameworks. Furthermore, in LP, practical proficiency may develop through muscle memory even when theoretical recall remains biased, suggesting that educational assessments should increasingly integrate both cognitive and procedural metrics.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Good health and well-being, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.