Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of calculated serum osmolarity for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients, using clinical impression of dehydration as the reference standard, and to examine glucose levels across concordant and discordant classification groups. Design and setting This prospective, observational study was conducted in a geriatric acute care unit. Participants The study included 455 older hospitalized patients with a mean age of 82.2 ± 6.8 years and 70% were female. Measurements Clinical impression of dehydration (dehydration vs. no dehydration [normal hydration + hyperhydration]) was judged and recorded by the attending physician within 24 h of admission. Calculated serum osmolarity was derived from routine laboratory values and classified as high (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) or normal (< 295 mOsmol/l). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy) and agreement (Cohen’s κ) were calculated. Glucose was compared between concordant/discordant groups. Results Clinically, 23% of patients were classified as dehydrated. High calculated osmolarity occurred in 38%. Using the ≥ 295 mOsmol/l cut-off, sensitivity was 48.6% and specificity 65.1%; positive and negative predictive values were 29.7% and 80.7%, respectively, and accuracy was 61.3%. Agreement beyond chance was poor (κ = 0.112). Mean glucose was higher in osmolarity-positive groups, including false positives (all p < 0.001 for planned pairwise comparisons). Conclusion In older hospitalized patients, calculated serum osmolarity (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) showed limited agreement with clinical dehydration assessment with frequent osmolarity-positive classifications in clinically non-dehydrated patients. These findings support cautious clinical interpretation of calculated osmolarity in acute care, particularly when glucose is elevated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08503-6
Primary Topic
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients

Ulrike Sonja Trampisch, Baigang Wang, Rainer Wirth, Chantal Giehl et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
article

Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients

Ulrike Sonja Trampisch, Baigang Wang, Rainer Wirth, Chantal Giehl, Maryam Pourhassan, Lukas Funk, Maria Schnepper, Isabel Levermann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of calculated serum osmolarity for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients, using clinical impression of dehydration as the reference standard, and to examine glucose levels across concordant and discordant classification groups. Design and setting This prospective, observational study was conducted in a geriatric acute care unit. Participants The study included 455 older hospitalized patients with a mean age of 82.2 ± 6.8 years and 70% were female. Measurements Clinical impression of dehydration (dehydration vs. no dehydration [normal hydration + hyperhydration]) was judged and recorded by the attending physician within 24 h of admission. Calculated serum osmolarity was derived from routine laboratory values and classified as high (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) or normal (< 295 mOsmol/l). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy) and agreement (Cohen’s κ) were calculated. Glucose was compared between concordant/discordant groups. Results Clinically, 23% of patients were classified as dehydrated. High calculated osmolarity occurred in 38%. Using the ≥ 295 mOsmol/l cut-off, sensitivity was 48.6% and specificity 65.1%; positive and negative predictive values were 29.7% and 80.7%, respectively, and accuracy was 61.3%. Agreement beyond chance was poor (κ = 0.112). Mean glucose was higher in osmolarity-positive groups, including false positives (all p < 0.001 for planned pairwise comparisons). Conclusion In older hospitalized patients, calculated serum osmolarity (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) showed limited agreement with clinical dehydration assessment with frequent osmolarity-positive classifications in clinically non-dehydrated patients. These findings support cautious clinical interpretation of calculated osmolarity in acute care, particularly when glucose is elevated.

BMC Geriatrics
Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.