Chios Mastic in Well‐Controlled Hypertension: Findings From the HYPER ‐ MASTIC Randomized Controlled Trial

Residual cardiovascular risk persists in patients with adequately controlled hypertension, driven partly by inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Chios mastic (Pistacia lentiscus var. Chia) has shown antihypertensive, antioxidant and vascular effects in experimental and clinical settings. This trial evaluated whether Chios mastic supplementation confers additional cardiovascular benefits in well-controlled hypertensive individuals. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 106 adults with stable, well-controlled hypertension and variable cardiovascular risk, based on SCORE2, received low-dose Chios mastic (1500 mg/day), high-dose Chios mastic (2800 mg/day) or placebo for 3 months. Primary endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Secondary endpoints included vascular function, oxidative stress and proteasome activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and red blood cells. Transcriptomic profiling was performed in a predefined high-risk subgroup. Chios mastic supplementation was well tolerated, with high adherence confirmed by dose-dependent increases in plasma masticadienonic and isomasticadienonic acids. No significant between-group differences were observed in 24-h systolic or diastolic blood pressure after the intervention. Oxidative stress markers and proteasome activity remained unchanged across groups. In high-risk participants, mastic supplementation induced distinct transcriptomic changes, particularly in pathways related to endothelial junction organization and vascular integrity. Overall, in adults with well-controlled hypertension and low baseline cardiovascular risk, Chios mastic supplementation did not lower blood pressure over 3 months, likely reflecting a ceiling effect. Transcriptomic findings suggest biologically meaningful vascular effects in individuals with higher residual cardiovascular risk, supporting future investigation in higher-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70322
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chios Mastic in Well‐Controlled Hypertension: Findings From the HYPER ‐ MASTIC Randomized Controlled Trial

Despoina D. Gianniou, Christina Konstantaki, George V. Dedoussis, Eleni V. Mikropoulou et al.
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Chios Mastic in Well‐Controlled Hypertension: Findings From the HYPER ‐ MASTIC Randomized Controlled Trial

Despoina D. Gianniou, Christina Konstantaki, George V. Dedoussis, Eleni V. Mikropoulou, Dimitrios Valakos, Ioannis P. Trougakos, Lasthenis Angelidakis, Efstathios D. Manios, Giannis Vatsellas, Kimon S. Stamatelopoulos, E. Nikolaou, Maria Halabalaki, Anastasia-Areti Kyriazopoulou-Korovesi, Maria Papaioannou, Ioanna Panagiota Kalafati, Ioanna Andreadou, Παναγιώτα Γιαρδόγλου
article en

Abstract

Residual cardiovascular risk persists in patients with adequately controlled hypertension, driven partly by inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Chios mastic (Pistacia lentiscus var. Chia) has shown antihypertensive, antioxidant and vascular effects in experimental and clinical settings. This trial evaluated whether Chios mastic supplementation confers additional cardiovascular benefits in well-controlled hypertensive individuals. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 106 adults with stable, well-controlled hypertension and variable cardiovascular risk, based on SCORE2, received low-dose Chios mastic (1500 mg/day), high-dose Chios mastic (2800 mg/day) or placebo for 3 months. Primary endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Secondary endpoints included vascular function, oxidative stress and proteasome activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and red blood cells. Transcriptomic profiling was performed in a predefined high-risk subgroup. Chios mastic supplementation was well tolerated, with high adherence confirmed by dose-dependent increases in plasma masticadienonic and isomasticadienonic acids. No significant between-group differences were observed in 24-h systolic or diastolic blood pressure after the intervention. Oxidative stress markers and proteasome activity remained unchanged across groups. In high-risk participants, mastic supplementation induced distinct transcriptomic changes, particularly in pathways related to endothelial junction organization and vascular integrity. Overall, in adults with well-controlled hypertension and low baseline cardiovascular risk, Chios mastic supplementation did not lower blood pressure over 3 months, likely reflecting a ceiling effect. Transcriptomic findings suggest biologically meaningful vascular effects in individuals with higher residual cardiovascular risk, supporting future investigation in higher-risk populations.

Pharmacology Research & PerspectivesVol. 14(6)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Academy of Athens (GR), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.