Comparative response of multistory reinforced concrete frame buildings to subsurface blast and earthquake loading based on ES EN 1998–1:2015

This study presents a comparative analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings under subsurface blast and earthquake loads. Four configurations (6- and 12-story with 3×3 and 3×4 bays) are analyzed. Blast loads use a 3 kg TNT subsurface explosion at 4 m, 7 m, and 10 m standoff in sandy soil. Earthquake loads use ES EN1998-1:2015 response spectra (PGA 0.05 g–2 g, 5% damping). Linear direct integration time-history is used for blast,response spectrum analysis for seismic. Results show that increasing standoff from 4 to 10 m reduces displacements by 85–90%. For the specific scenario studied (3 kg TNT, linear elastic response, sandy soil), displacements at 4 m standoff are comparable to 0.2 g–0.3 g PGA earthquakes (Ground Type A/B, Spectrum Type 1). At 7 m, blast effects are comparable to ~0.1 g PGA; at 10 m, displacements fall below 0.05 g PGA. Additional response parameters (base shear, acceleration, and modal periods) show that this displacement-based comparison does not extend to other design metrics. These findings are limited to linear elastic global displacement comparison and do not constitute a general equivalence for blast-resistant design. Nonlinear material response, larger charge weights, and soil–structure interaction require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Civil Engineering
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-026-00617-5
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative response of multistory reinforced concrete frame buildings to subsurface blast and earthquake loading based on ES EN 1998–1:2015

Yihenew Telay Addisu, Ewineta Assefa Yisayas
Discover Civil Engineering
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Comparative response of multistory reinforced concrete frame buildings to subsurface blast and earthquake loading based on ES EN 1998–1:2015

Yihenew Telay Addisu, Ewineta Assefa Yisayas
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings under subsurface blast and earthquake loads. Four configurations (6- and 12-story with 3×3 and 3×4 bays) are analyzed. Blast loads use a 3 kg TNT subsurface explosion at 4 m, 7 m, and 10 m standoff in sandy soil. Earthquake loads use ES EN1998-1:2015 response spectra (PGA 0.05 g–2 g, 5% damping). Linear direct integration time-history is used for blast,response spectrum analysis for seismic. Results show that increasing standoff from 4 to 10 m reduces displacements by 85–90%. For the specific scenario studied (3 kg TNT, linear elastic response, sandy soil), displacements at 4 m standoff are comparable to 0.2 g–0.3 g PGA earthquakes (Ground Type A/B, Spectrum Type 1). At 7 m, blast effects are comparable to ~0.1 g PGA; at 10 m, displacements fall below 0.05 g PGA. Additional response parameters (base shear, acceleration, and modal periods) show that this displacement-based comparison does not extend to other design metrics. These findings are limited to linear elastic global displacement comparison and do not constitute a general equivalence for blast-resistant design. Nonlinear material response, larger charge weights, and soil–structure interaction require further investigation.

Discover Civil EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Debre Markos University (ET)
Debre Markos University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.