Bridging the Computational Gap in the Social Sciences: Dual Innovations in Pedagogy and Assessment

In a world increasingly dominated by data, graduates in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields are in high demand. This focus often obscures the fact that a significant portion of digital data is social in nature, generated through human–computer interactions. Consequently, experts trained in the social sciences should be equally sought after, yet this is not consistently the case. A contributing factor is the tendency for social and political science departments to adhere to traditional disciplinary boundaries, inadvertently marginalizing their graduates from a growing number of data-centric professions. This paper argues that this gap can and should be addressed. We present a pedagogical project initiated at the University of Bologna, centered on a tailored data literacy and social computing course designed for Political Science students. This study evaluates a dual-case pedagogical investigation evaluating two complementary but empirically independent educational initiatives—conducted across distinct courses, student cohorts, and academic years—unified under an overarching conceptual framework for social science data literacy. This framework combines interactive peer-led learning (Case Study 1) with an instructor-driven, backend Generative AI workflow for multiple-choice question generation utilizing Google Gemini via AI Studio (Case Study 2). Crucially, Generative AI tools were utilized strictly as an offline editorial assistant by the instructor to streamline item creation, maintaining a rigorous human-in-the-loop assessment model, while student examinations remained offline and unassisted. The results and student feedback have been noteworthy, demonstrating improved learning outcomes and high satisfaction, despite methodological limitations including sample size constraints and a quasi-experimental design. We share this experience to encourage colleagues in the social and political sciences to replicate and adapt this model, thereby better equipping their students for the demands of the modern professional landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16101735
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Computational Gap in the Social Sciences: Dual Innovations in Pedagogy and Assessment

Giampiero Giacomello, Fabio Leone
Education Sciences
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

Bridging the Computational Gap in the Social Sciences: Dual Innovations in Pedagogy and Assessment

Giampiero Giacomello, Fabio Leone
article en

Abstract

In a world increasingly dominated by data, graduates in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields are in high demand. This focus often obscures the fact that a significant portion of digital data is social in nature, generated through human–computer interactions. Consequently, experts trained in the social sciences should be equally sought after, yet this is not consistently the case. A contributing factor is the tendency for social and political science departments to adhere to traditional disciplinary boundaries, inadvertently marginalizing their graduates from a growing number of data-centric professions. This paper argues that this gap can and should be addressed. We present a pedagogical project initiated at the University of Bologna, centered on a tailored data literacy and social computing course designed for Political Science students. This study evaluates a dual-case pedagogical investigation evaluating two complementary but empirically independent educational initiatives—conducted across distinct courses, student cohorts, and academic years—unified under an overarching conceptual framework for social science data literacy. This framework combines interactive peer-led learning (Case Study 1) with an instructor-driven, backend Generative AI workflow for multiple-choice question generation utilizing Google Gemini via AI Studio (Case Study 2). Crucially, Generative AI tools were utilized strictly as an offline editorial assistant by the instructor to streamline item creation, maintaining a rigorous human-in-the-loop assessment model, while student examinations remained offline and unassisted. The results and student feedback have been noteworthy, demonstrating improved learning outcomes and high satisfaction, despite methodological limitations including sample size constraints and a quasi-experimental design. We share this experience to encourage colleagues in the social and political sciences to replicate and adapt this model, thereby better equipping their students for the demands of the modern professional landscape.

Education SciencesVol. 16(10)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Quality education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.