Ibn Khaldûn as a Colonial Archive: Toward an Epistemic Decolonization

Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldûn not as a stable, timeless precursor of modern social science but as a figure constituted through colonial translation and reception. Focusing on nineteenth- and twentieth-century French and English translations of the Muqaddimah , it argues that Ibn Khaldûn emerged in modern scholarship as a colonial archive—a site where translation, race, and epistemic authority intersected to produce new forms of historical and sociological knowledge. Through close comparison of Arabic originals and their European translations, the article shows how colonial epistemologies reconfigured Ibn Khaldûn’s analytical categories—particularly those concerning tribe, generation, civilization, and climate—into racialized frameworks foreign to his medieval context. It further demonstrates how this translated Ibn Khaldûn became selectively relevant to European social science while remaining excluded from its canonical genealogies. Finally, the article critically reassesses the enduring claim that Ibn Khaldûn articulated racist views about Black populations, showing that this attribution itself belongs to the colonial archive generated through translation rather than to the epistemic logic of the original text. The article thus contributes to comparative histories of knowledge, colonial epistemology, and the global formation of the social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417526100693
Primary Topic
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ibn Khaldûn as a Colonial Archive: Toward an Epistemic Decolonization

Abdelmajid Hannoum
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
article

Ibn Khaldûn as a Colonial Archive: Toward an Epistemic Decolonization

Abdelmajid Hannoum
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldûn not as a stable, timeless precursor of modern social science but as a figure constituted through colonial translation and reception. Focusing on nineteenth- and twentieth-century French and English translations of the Muqaddimah , it argues that Ibn Khaldûn emerged in modern scholarship as a colonial archive—a site where translation, race, and epistemic authority intersected to produce new forms of historical and sociological knowledge. Through close comparison of Arabic originals and their European translations, the article shows how colonial epistemologies reconfigured Ibn Khaldûn’s analytical categories—particularly those concerning tribe, generation, civilization, and climate—into racialized frameworks foreign to his medieval context. It further demonstrates how this translated Ibn Khaldûn became selectively relevant to European social science while remaining excluded from its canonical genealogies. Finally, the article critically reassesses the enduring claim that Ibn Khaldûn articulated racist views about Black populations, showing that this attribution itself belongs to the colonial archive generated through translation rather than to the epistemic logic of the original text. The article thus contributes to comparative histories of knowledge, colonial epistemology, and the global formation of the social sciences.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.