Corporate or Employee Source? The Effect of LinkedIn Employer Branding Source on Employer Evaluations and Intention to Apply

Professional social networking platforms have transformed employer branding by reshaping how organizations communicate with potential applicants and by altering the perceived source of employer-related messages. While corporate-generated employer branding messages remain central to organizational communication strategies, such messages may also be interpreted as controlled, promotional and strategically managed. In contrast, employee-generated communication may function as a more socially grounded and credible signal of the employment experience. Drawing on signaling theory and source credibility theory, this study examines whether the source of LinkedIn employer branding content influences employer evaluations and intention to apply and investigates the proposed pathway underlying this relationship. A between-subjects experiment was conducted with 198 participants, who were randomly assigned to view either a corporate-generated or an employee-generated LinkedIn employer branding message. The employer branding message was held constant across conditions and only the attributed source was manipulated. The study examined perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust, organizational attractiveness and intention to apply. Participants exposed to the employee-generated LinkedIn message reported significantly higher perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust, organizational attractiveness and intention to apply than those exposed to the corporate-generated post. Path analysis also identified a significant serial indirect effect consistent with the proposed pathway from LinkedIn source to intention to apply through perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust and organizational attractiveness. These findings suggest that employee source can operate as a perceived authenticity signal within platform-mediated employer branding. The study contributes to employer branding research by demonstrating that, in professional social media environments, the source of employer branding content meaningfully influences how potential applicants interpret and evaluate the employer. Practically, the findings highlight the importance of integrating credible employee-generated LinkedIn communication into employer branding strategies rather than relying exclusively on corporate-controlled communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Platforms
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/platforms4040023
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate or Employee Source? The Effect of LinkedIn Employer Branding Source on Employer Evaluations and Intention to Apply

Evdokia Tsoni, Vera Lazanaki, Pavlina Katiaj
Platforms
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

Corporate or Employee Source? The Effect of LinkedIn Employer Branding Source on Employer Evaluations and Intention to Apply

Evdokia Tsoni, Vera Lazanaki, Pavlina Katiaj
article en

Abstract

Professional social networking platforms have transformed employer branding by reshaping how organizations communicate with potential applicants and by altering the perceived source of employer-related messages. While corporate-generated employer branding messages remain central to organizational communication strategies, such messages may also be interpreted as controlled, promotional and strategically managed. In contrast, employee-generated communication may function as a more socially grounded and credible signal of the employment experience. Drawing on signaling theory and source credibility theory, this study examines whether the source of LinkedIn employer branding content influences employer evaluations and intention to apply and investigates the proposed pathway underlying this relationship. A between-subjects experiment was conducted with 198 participants, who were randomly assigned to view either a corporate-generated or an employee-generated LinkedIn employer branding message. The employer branding message was held constant across conditions and only the attributed source was manipulated. The study examined perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust, organizational attractiveness and intention to apply. Participants exposed to the employee-generated LinkedIn message reported significantly higher perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust, organizational attractiveness and intention to apply than those exposed to the corporate-generated post. Path analysis also identified a significant serial indirect effect consistent with the proposed pathway from LinkedIn source to intention to apply through perceived employer authenticity, employer brand trust and organizational attractiveness. These findings suggest that employee source can operate as a perceived authenticity signal within platform-mediated employer branding. The study contributes to employer branding research by demonstrating that, in professional social media environments, the source of employer branding content meaningfully influences how potential applicants interpret and evaluate the employer. Practically, the findings highlight the importance of integrating credible employee-generated LinkedIn communication into employer branding strategies rather than relying exclusively on corporate-controlled communication.

PlatformsVol. 4(4)
Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.