Perpetrator Identity and Post-Conflict Ethnic Attitudes: The Legacies of Intragroup and Intergroup Violence

Researchers have extensively examined how political violence shapes social and political behavior, yet most studies focus on interethnic violence and assume a binary conflict structure. This study challenges that assumption by examining how perpetrator identity, ingroup versus outgroup, shapes postwar intergroup relations. Using original survey data from Tamil civilians in Northern Sri Lanka, we analyze exposure to intragroup and intergroup violence during Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war, which involved substantial violence both across and within ethnic groups. We find that exposure to intragroup violence is associated with lower trust toward coethnics, reduced ingroup favoritism in attitudes and behavior, and weaker reliance on ethnic cues in political choice. In contrast, exposure to intergroup violence increases interethnic prejudice and social distance, heightens discrimination in behavioral interactions, and strengthens ethnically motivated political behavior. These findings indicate that perpetrator identity shapes the social legacies of wartime violence and can generate opposing postwar dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261455875
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perpetrator Identity and Post-Conflict Ethnic Attitudes: The Legacies of Intragroup and Intergroup Violence

Joan Barceló, Keshana Ratnasingham
Comparative Political Studies
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Perpetrator Identity and Post-Conflict Ethnic Attitudes: The Legacies of Intragroup and Intergroup Violence

Joan Barceló, Keshana Ratnasingham
article en

Abstract

Researchers have extensively examined how political violence shapes social and political behavior, yet most studies focus on interethnic violence and assume a binary conflict structure. This study challenges that assumption by examining how perpetrator identity, ingroup versus outgroup, shapes postwar intergroup relations. Using original survey data from Tamil civilians in Northern Sri Lanka, we analyze exposure to intragroup and intergroup violence during Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war, which involved substantial violence both across and within ethnic groups. We find that exposure to intragroup violence is associated with lower trust toward coethnics, reduced ingroup favoritism in attitudes and behavior, and weaker reliance on ethnic cues in political choice. In contrast, exposure to intergroup violence increases interethnic prejudice and social distance, heightens discrimination in behavioral interactions, and strengthens ethnically motivated political behavior. These findings indicate that perpetrator identity shapes the social legacies of wartime violence and can generate opposing postwar dynamics.

Comparative Political Studies
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE)
New York University Abu Dhabi
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.