Interventions for LGBTQ+ Youth: A Scoping Review to Support Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States

Background: Youth in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and other dissident genders and sexualities (LGBTQ+) community face extensive health disparities and dynamic political landscapes. Occupational therapy (OT) has potential to support LGBTQ+ youth; however, there is limited guidance for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants seeking to implement evidence-based interventions with this population. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to examine interventions within the scope of OT to support LGBTQ+ youth. Method: We used Arksey and O'Malley’s framework to guide this scoping review and searched five databases: PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Using Covidence, we included peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States that used interventions within the scope of OT with LGBTQ+ youth. Studies were thematically organized based on intervention type. Results: Thirty studies were included with only one study evaluating an OT intervention and the remaining being within the scope of OT. Five intervention types were highlighted: psychosocial, activity-based, sexual health, camp-based, and employment-focused. Psychosocial interventions were the most common and levels of evidence varied across studies. Conclusion: Occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants can support LGBTQ+ youth through select interventions of various rigor. Future research is needed to develop OT-driven and occupation-centered interventions for LGBTQ+ youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.2531
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions for LGBTQ+ Youth: A Scoping Review to Support Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States

A. Valente, Ricardo Daniel Ramirez, Jennifer C. Westrick, Alexandrea Guiritan et al.
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Interventions for LGBTQ+ Youth: A Scoping Review to Support Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States

A. Valente, Ricardo Daniel Ramirez, Jennifer C. Westrick, Alexandrea Guiritan, Iris Nosek, Francinne Fotopoulos
article en

Abstract

Background: Youth in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and other dissident genders and sexualities (LGBTQ+) community face extensive health disparities and dynamic political landscapes. Occupational therapy (OT) has potential to support LGBTQ+ youth; however, there is limited guidance for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants seeking to implement evidence-based interventions with this population. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to examine interventions within the scope of OT to support LGBTQ+ youth. Method: We used Arksey and O'Malley’s framework to guide this scoping review and searched five databases: PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Using Covidence, we included peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States that used interventions within the scope of OT with LGBTQ+ youth. Studies were thematically organized based on intervention type. Results: Thirty studies were included with only one study evaluating an OT intervention and the remaining being within the scope of OT. Five intervention types were highlighted: psychosocial, activity-based, sexual health, camp-based, and employment-focused. Psychosocial interventions were the most common and levels of evidence varied across studies. Conclusion: Occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants can support LGBTQ+ youth through select interventions of various rigor. Future research is needed to develop OT-driven and occupation-centered interventions for LGBTQ+ youth.

The Open Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 14(4)
Rush University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.