Clinical Performance of the IWGDF Risk Stratification System for Diabetic Foot Ulceration: A Gender-Disaggregated Study of 713 Patients
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes and is a leading cause of lower-extremity amputation. This study evaluated the cross-sectional discriminative performance of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) risk classification for prevalent active DFU, described gender-disaggregated ulcer prevalence, and identified factors independently associated with moderate/high IWGDF risk in a specialist diabetes center. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 713 adults with diabetes mellitus who attended the diabetic foot service of a university diabetes center were classified according to the IWGDF risk system. The prevalence of active DFU was compared across risk categories using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with moderate/high IWGDF risk and active DFU. RESULTS: Active DFU was present in 21 patients (2.9%), with no significant difference between men (3.8%) and women (2.1%). Overall, 17.3% of the patients were classified as having moderate or high risk. Ulcer prevalence increased progressively across the IWGDF categories, from 0.0% in the very-low-risk group to 38.5% in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). The IWGDF classification showed excellent cross-sectional discrimination for prevalent active DFU (c-statistic 0.938), with 90.5% sensitivity and 99.7% negative predictive value at the moderate/high-risk threshold. Older age and higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were independently associated with moderate/high IWGDF risk, whereas gender was not. CONCLUSION: The IWGDF classification showed excellent cross-sectional discrimination for prevalent active DFU. Older age and poorer glycemic control, but not gender, were independently associated with moderate/high IWGDF risk. These findings support routine IWGDF-guided risk stratification in specialist diabetes care, although prospective studies are required to establish its performance in predicting future ulceration.
Authors
- Metab Algeffari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0614-2558)
- Fatimah Z Alenazi
- António Raposo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-2249)
- Thamer Alslamah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-9514)
- Basmah F. Alharbi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-469X)
- Faisal I. Almohaileb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-1429)
- Yasir Alsalamah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-7759)
- Wafa Ibrahim Alotaibi
- Mirna Awni Fawaz
Institutions
- Qassim University (SA)
- Beirut Arab University (LB)
- Buraydah Colleges (SA)
- King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diabetes Therapy
- Published
- 2026-10-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01925-w
- Primary Topic
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Qassim University