Capturing classroom relational climate using teacher ratings of relational quality with individual students

Teacher–student relationships are resources for students' learning and development. Effectively supporting these relationships in elementary schools requires clear conceptualization and operationalization. Guided by attachment theory, we used multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) to conceptualize and operationalize teacher–student relational quality—simultaneously—at both the dyadic and classroom levels. Specifically, we decomposed the variance in teachers' ratings of relational quality with individual students into within-classroom (dyadic) and between-classroom (classroom) components, while modeling latent factor structures at each level. Data came from 330 U.S. elementary school teachers who rated their perceived relational quality with each student in their classroom, for an average of 17 students per classroom. ML-CFA results indicated that the same two-factor structure, relational closeness and conflict, exists at both levels. Tests of convergent validity provided evidence of external construct validity for classroom relational conflict, but limited evidence for classroom relational closeness. These findings highlight the importance of simultaneously modeling relational closeness and conflict at both dyadic and classroom levels to enhance precision in understanding teacher–student relationships in elementary classrooms, and provide initial empirical support for the theoretical model underpinning this literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of School Psychology
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101620
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing classroom relational climate using teacher ratings of relational quality with individual students

Joshua L. Brown, Catherine M. Corbin, Pilar Álamos, Jason Troy Downer
Journal of School Psychology
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

Capturing classroom relational climate using teacher ratings of relational quality with individual students

Joshua L. Brown, Catherine M. Corbin, Pilar Álamos, Jason Troy Downer
article en

Abstract

Teacher–student relationships are resources for students' learning and development. Effectively supporting these relationships in elementary schools requires clear conceptualization and operationalization. Guided by attachment theory, we used multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) to conceptualize and operationalize teacher–student relational quality—simultaneously—at both the dyadic and classroom levels. Specifically, we decomposed the variance in teachers' ratings of relational quality with individual students into within-classroom (dyadic) and between-classroom (classroom) components, while modeling latent factor structures at each level. Data came from 330 U.S. elementary school teachers who rated their perceived relational quality with each student in their classroom, for an average of 17 students per classroom. ML-CFA results indicated that the same two-factor structure, relational closeness and conflict, exists at both levels. Tests of convergent validity provided evidence of external construct validity for classroom relational conflict, but limited evidence for classroom relational closeness. These findings highlight the importance of simultaneously modeling relational closeness and conflict at both dyadic and classroom levels to enhance precision in understanding teacher–student relationships in elementary classrooms, and provide initial empirical support for the theoretical model underpinning this literature.

Journal of School PsychologyVol. 119
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Fordham University (US)
Jacobs Foundation, Institute of Education Sciences
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.