A Predictive Operating-System Control Layer for Quantum Computing Hardware and Execution Stacks

Quantum processors exhibit time-varying hardwaredrift, environmental fluctuations, and correlated control errorsthat challenge reliable execution and increase the physical errorburden presented to higher-level error-correction procedures.Existing approaches address important aspects of quantumcalibration, feedback control, scheduling, and error correction,but these functions are typically studied and implemented asdistinct components. We introduce QID-OS (Quantum Intelligent Dynamic Operating System), an operating-system-levelcontrol-plane architecture for quantum execution that mediatesbetween physical hardware telemetry and higher-level compilation, runtime, and quantum error-correction services. QID-OSintegrates causal recursive least-squares (RLS) online parameterestimation, predictive pulse-level compensation, and adaptiveexecution scheduling within a closed-loop runtime architecture.The proposed framework is evaluated using a distance-3 surfacecode simulation under a specified non-Markovian noise model, afull-factorial 23 module ablation, and experiments on a 5-qubitconnected subset of an IBM Quantum superconducting processor.In simulation, QID-OS improves logical success probability overthe evaluated noise conditions, and the full configuration achievesthe highest success probability among the evaluated modulecombinations. On superconducting hardware, the experimentallyvalidated online RLS estimation and active pulse-compensationcomponents increase computational-basis success probabilityfrom 68.5% ± 0.4% to 88.4% ± 0.3% across three independent8-hour calibration windows, comprising 300 randomized testcircuits and 2,457,600 total measurement shots. These resultsdemonstrate the feasibility of using a predictive control-planearchitecture to mitigate hardware-level errors prior to higherlevel quantum error-correction processing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23426271
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Predictive Operating-System Control Layer for Quantum Computing Hardware and Execution Stacks

TADAYUKI NISHIMURA
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
preprint

A Predictive Operating-System Control Layer for Quantum Computing Hardware and Execution Stacks

TADAYUKI NISHIMURA
preprint en

Abstract

Quantum processors exhibit time-varying hardwaredrift, environmental fluctuations, and correlated control errorsthat challenge reliable execution and increase the physical errorburden presented to higher-level error-correction procedures.Existing approaches address important aspects of quantumcalibration, feedback control, scheduling, and error correction,but these functions are typically studied and implemented asdistinct components. We introduce QID-OS (Quantum Intelligent Dynamic Operating System), an operating-system-levelcontrol-plane architecture for quantum execution that mediatesbetween physical hardware telemetry and higher-level compilation, runtime, and quantum error-correction services. QID-OSintegrates causal recursive least-squares (RLS) online parameterestimation, predictive pulse-level compensation, and adaptiveexecution scheduling within a closed-loop runtime architecture.The proposed framework is evaluated using a distance-3 surfacecode simulation under a specified non-Markovian noise model, afull-factorial 23 module ablation, and experiments on a 5-qubitconnected subset of an IBM Quantum superconducting processor.In simulation, QID-OS improves logical success probability overthe evaluated noise conditions, and the full configuration achievesthe highest success probability among the evaluated modulecombinations. On superconducting hardware, the experimentallyvalidated online RLS estimation and active pulse-compensationcomponents increase computational-basis success probabilityfrom 68.5% ± 0.4% to 88.4% ± 0.3% across three independent8-hour calibration windows, comprising 300 randomized testcircuits and 2,457,600 total measurement shots. These resultsdemonstrate the feasibility of using a predictive control-planearchitecture to mitigate hardware-level errors prior to higherlevel quantum error-correction processing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.