Exploring Career Pathways of the Occupational Therapy AFWC Role: A Review of Push, Pull, and Stay Factors

Academic Fieldwork Coordinators (AFWCs) are essential to occupational therapy (OT) education, yet little is known about the career pathways, retention, and attrition associated with this role. With increasing faculty turnover, understanding the factors that influence AFWC career decisions is critical. This mixed-methods study surveyed 187 OT educators across the US, including current, former, and never-serving AFWCs. A researcher-designed Qualtrics survey gathered demographic, quantitative, and open-ended qualitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed using chi-square tests; qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Respondents reported psychological (e.g., burnout, satisfaction), job (e.g., mentoring, administrative burden), organizational (e.g., support, workload), and leadership/team (e.g., recognition, collaboration) factors that influenced their decisions to pursue, remain in, or leave the AFWC role. While mentoring students was consistently ranked most valuable and enjoyable, administrative duties were least favorable. Nearly one-third of current AFWCs reported intent to leave their role within 2 years, often citing workload and lack of support. AFWC roles often serve as a pathway into academia but suffer from limited support, unclear preparation, and high attrition. Findings highlight the need for structured onboarding, supportive leadership, and retention strategies to sustain the OT fieldwork education workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.2519
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Career Pathways of the Occupational Therapy AFWC Role: A Review of Push, Pull, and Stay Factors

Patricia A. Laverdure, Elizabeth Dwyer DeIuliis, Kimberley Persons, Elizabeth D LeQuieu
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Exploring Career Pathways of the Occupational Therapy AFWC Role: A Review of Push, Pull, and Stay Factors

Patricia A. Laverdure, Elizabeth Dwyer DeIuliis, Kimberley Persons, Elizabeth D LeQuieu
article en

Abstract

Academic Fieldwork Coordinators (AFWCs) are essential to occupational therapy (OT) education, yet little is known about the career pathways, retention, and attrition associated with this role. With increasing faculty turnover, understanding the factors that influence AFWC career decisions is critical. This mixed-methods study surveyed 187 OT educators across the US, including current, former, and never-serving AFWCs. A researcher-designed Qualtrics survey gathered demographic, quantitative, and open-ended qualitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed using chi-square tests; qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Respondents reported psychological (e.g., burnout, satisfaction), job (e.g., mentoring, administrative burden), organizational (e.g., support, workload), and leadership/team (e.g., recognition, collaboration) factors that influenced their decisions to pursue, remain in, or leave the AFWC role. While mentoring students was consistently ranked most valuable and enjoyable, administrative duties were least favorable. Nearly one-third of current AFWCs reported intent to leave their role within 2 years, often citing workload and lack of support. AFWC roles often serve as a pathway into academia but suffer from limited support, unclear preparation, and high attrition. Findings highlight the need for structured onboarding, supportive leadership, and retention strategies to sustain the OT fieldwork education workforce.

The Open Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 14(4)
St. Catherine University (US), Duquesne University (US), Dominion (United States) (US), Arkansas Department of Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.