Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Accurately Estimate the Size of Glenoid Labrum Tears in Patients With Shoulder Instability

Purpose To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based measurements of glenoid labral tears with intraoperative measurements. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients that underwent shoulder capsulorrhaphy between 2019 and 2024 at a single academic medical center. All patients with a single labrum tear, an MRI within 6 months of surgery, and historical tear measurements or measurable intraoperative photographs were included in the study. Glenoid labrum tear size was noted using the clockface convention described in “hours.” When clockface measurements were not reported on MRI reads, measurements were made by a radiologist. When clockface measurements were not reported in operative notes, measurements were made by an orthopaedic surgeon using intraoperative photographs. A paired t test was used to evaluate any difference between the MRI and intraoperative measurements. Results Two hundred sixteen glenoid labral tears from 211 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 27.2 ± 11.8 years, 68.5% of patients were men, and 56.9% of glenoid labrum tears were right‐sided. On average, MRI measurements exceeded intraoperative measurements (4.15 ± 2.90 hours vs 2.80 ± 1.59 hours) with an average difference of 1.36 ± 3.09 hours (95% confidence interval = 0.94‐1.77, P < .001) and a correlation of 0.154 ( P = .023). A greater difference in measurement was observed among men compared with women (1.64 vs 0.74 hours, P = .044). Conclusions MRI overestimated glenoid labrum tear size compared with intraoperative measurements and differed substantially between the 2 modalities on a case‐by‐case basis, with men displaying a larger discrepancy in measurement difference than women. These findings indicate that MRI may be more appropriately used as a categorical tool for confirming the presence of glenoid labral tears, rather than as a precise measure of tear size. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective diagnostic case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70125
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Accurately Estimate the Size of Glenoid Labrum Tears in Patients With Shoulder Instability

Ronak J. Mahatme, Susan E. Braley, Cameron Crasto, Brian M. Grawe et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Accurately Estimate the Size of Glenoid Labrum Tears in Patients With Shoulder Instability

Ronak J. Mahatme, Susan E. Braley, Cameron Crasto, Brian M. Grawe, Antonia S. Caldwell, Samuel K. Gerak, Benjamin E Jevnikar, Shawn A. Moore, William A. Crites
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based measurements of glenoid labral tears with intraoperative measurements. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients that underwent shoulder capsulorrhaphy between 2019 and 2024 at a single academic medical center. All patients with a single labrum tear, an MRI within 6 months of surgery, and historical tear measurements or measurable intraoperative photographs were included in the study. Glenoid labrum tear size was noted using the clockface convention described in “hours.” When clockface measurements were not reported on MRI reads, measurements were made by a radiologist. When clockface measurements were not reported in operative notes, measurements were made by an orthopaedic surgeon using intraoperative photographs. A paired t test was used to evaluate any difference between the MRI and intraoperative measurements. Results Two hundred sixteen glenoid labral tears from 211 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 27.2 ± 11.8 years, 68.5% of patients were men, and 56.9% of glenoid labrum tears were right‐sided. On average, MRI measurements exceeded intraoperative measurements (4.15 ± 2.90 hours vs 2.80 ± 1.59 hours) with an average difference of 1.36 ± 3.09 hours (95% confidence interval = 0.94‐1.77, P < .001) and a correlation of 0.154 ( P = .023). A greater difference in measurement was observed among men compared with women (1.64 vs 0.74 hours, P = .044). Conclusions MRI overestimated glenoid labrum tear size compared with intraoperative measurements and differed substantially between the 2 modalities on a case‐by‐case basis, with men displaying a larger discrepancy in measurement difference than women. These findings indicate that MRI may be more appropriately used as a categorical tool for confirming the presence of glenoid labral tears, rather than as a precise measure of tear size. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective diagnostic case series.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.