Comparison of Unfractionated Heparin and Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin in Acute Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Subanalysis of the CLOT‐VENUS Registry

BACKGROUND: Optimal anticoagulation in acute cerebral vein thrombosis remains uncertain. We compared unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin, and identified predictors of functional recovery and UFH responsiveness. METHODS: This retrospective 2-center study from the multicenter international CLOT-VENUS (Collaboration on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis) registry included adults with acute cerebral vein thrombosis treated with UFH or enoxaparin (2004-2024). Baseline clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. UFH response was measured via a composite responsiveness index (Unfractionated Heparin Composite Response Index) based on partial thromboplastin time. The primary outcome was 6-month functional status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), and secondary outcomes included discharge mRS and death. RESULTS: Among 359 patients (median age, 40 [interquartile range, 28-54] years; 68.5% women), 220 (61.3%) received UFH and 139 (38.7%) enoxaparin. Only 64% of partial thromboplastin time values fell within the therapeutic range. UFH was associated with worse outcomes at discharge (mRS score, 3-6: adjusted odds ratio, 2.89; mRS score, 2-6: adjusted odds ratio, 1.90; ordinal mRS score, adjusted odds ratio, 1.56) and at 6 months (mRS score, 3-6: adjusted odds ratio, 2.63). Poor recovery was independently linked to the UFH composite responsiveness index and frequent infusion adjustments. Notably, in the sensitivity analysis limited to patients on UFH with ≥50%, ≥67%, and ≥79% therapeutic partial thromboplastin time values, the outcome differences diminished. Age was independently associated with UFH responsiveness, and female sex, body mass index, and NLR with the number of UFH infusion-rate adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UFH was associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with enoxaparin, largely attributable to suboptimal and inconsistent anticoagulation. However, when UFH achieves consistent therapeutic levels, the outcomes are comparable. Early predictors may help guide individualized anticoagulation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.046001
Primary Topic
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Unfractionated Heparin and Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin in Acute Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Subanalysis of the CLOT‐VENUS Registry

Nashwa Abdelhakim, Santiago Ortega‐Gutiérrez, Amir Shaban, Andrés A. Mercado-Pompa et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
article

Comparison of Unfractionated Heparin and Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin in Acute Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Subanalysis of the CLOT‐VENUS Registry

Nashwa Abdelhakim, Santiago Ortega‐Gutiérrez, Amir Shaban, Andrés A. Mercado-Pompa, Adrián Pereda Castillo, James C. Torner, Nicholas M. Mohr, Antonio Araúz, Vanessa Cano-Nigenda, Aarón Rodríguez-Calienes, Milagros Galecio‐Castillo, Brian James Smith, A. Manazir, Leonardo Cruz‐Criollo, Jorge Cespedes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal anticoagulation in acute cerebral vein thrombosis remains uncertain. We compared unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin, and identified predictors of functional recovery and UFH responsiveness. METHODS: This retrospective 2-center study from the multicenter international CLOT-VENUS (Collaboration on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis) registry included adults with acute cerebral vein thrombosis treated with UFH or enoxaparin (2004-2024). Baseline clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. UFH response was measured via a composite responsiveness index (Unfractionated Heparin Composite Response Index) based on partial thromboplastin time. The primary outcome was 6-month functional status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), and secondary outcomes included discharge mRS and death. RESULTS: Among 359 patients (median age, 40 [interquartile range, 28-54] years; 68.5% women), 220 (61.3%) received UFH and 139 (38.7%) enoxaparin. Only 64% of partial thromboplastin time values fell within the therapeutic range. UFH was associated with worse outcomes at discharge (mRS score, 3-6: adjusted odds ratio, 2.89; mRS score, 2-6: adjusted odds ratio, 1.90; ordinal mRS score, adjusted odds ratio, 1.56) and at 6 months (mRS score, 3-6: adjusted odds ratio, 2.63). Poor recovery was independently linked to the UFH composite responsiveness index and frequent infusion adjustments. Notably, in the sensitivity analysis limited to patients on UFH with ≥50%, ≥67%, and ≥79% therapeutic partial thromboplastin time values, the outcome differences diminished. Age was independently associated with UFH responsiveness, and female sex, body mass index, and NLR with the number of UFH infusion-rate adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UFH was associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with enoxaparin, largely attributable to suboptimal and inconsistent anticoagulation. However, when UFH achieves consistent therapeutic levels, the outcomes are comparable. Early predictors may help guide individualized anticoagulation strategies.

Journal of the American Heart Association
University of Iowa (US), University of Iowa Health Care (US), Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.