Predictors of clinical success in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is increasingly used for the management of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFC). We aimed to identify factors associated with clinical success, and to perform exploratory analyses of outcomes stratified by surgery type and stent type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage of POPFC following pancreatic surgery between 2014 and August 2024 at three academic centers. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as combined radiological and clinical resolution without the need for percutaneous or surgical step-up intervention. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients were included (mean age 64±14 years; 57% male; 52% underwent drainage ≤14 days after surgery, necrotic component in 51%). Clinical success was achieved in 194 patients (73%; 95% CI 67.5-78.1%), including 160 (60%; 95% CI 54.5-66.3%) after a single procedure and 34 after additional endoscopic reinterventions, while 20 patients (7.6%; 95% CI 4.4-10.7%) required percutaneous or surgical step-up. Distal pancreatectomy, compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy, was associated with a higher rate of reintervention (32% vs. 20%, p=0.02) and independently associated with lower odds of clinical success (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.98; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided drainage for POPFC appears effective, with an acceptable safety profile in expert centers, achieving clinical resolution in the majority of patients. Distal pancreatectomy was associated with a more complex treatment course. These findings support the use of EUS-guided drainage as a central component in the management of POPFC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2975-4821
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of clinical success in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections

Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Rogier P. Voermans, Hannah van Malenstein, Gitte Aabye Olsen et al.
Endoscopy
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Predictors of clinical success in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections

Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Rogier P. Voermans, Hannah van Malenstein, Gitte Aabye Olsen, Hanne Hellinckx, Wim Laleman, Baki Topal, Giuseppe Vanella, Francesco Frigo, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Halit Topal, Michiel J. Bronswijk, Marie-Anne Noreillie, Roberto Leone, S Van der Merwe, Hanna Peeters
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is increasingly used for the management of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFC). We aimed to identify factors associated with clinical success, and to perform exploratory analyses of outcomes stratified by surgery type and stent type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage of POPFC following pancreatic surgery between 2014 and August 2024 at three academic centers. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as combined radiological and clinical resolution without the need for percutaneous or surgical step-up intervention. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients were included (mean age 64±14 years; 57% male; 52% underwent drainage ≤14 days after surgery, necrotic component in 51%). Clinical success was achieved in 194 patients (73%; 95% CI 67.5-78.1%), including 160 (60%; 95% CI 54.5-66.3%) after a single procedure and 34 after additional endoscopic reinterventions, while 20 patients (7.6%; 95% CI 4.4-10.7%) required percutaneous or surgical step-up. Distal pancreatectomy, compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy, was associated with a higher rate of reintervention (32% vs. 20%, p=0.02) and independently associated with lower odds of clinical success (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.98; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided drainage for POPFC appears effective, with an acceptable safety profile in expert centers, achieving clinical resolution in the majority of patients. Distal pancreatectomy was associated with a more complex treatment course. These findings support the use of EUS-guided drainage as a central component in the management of POPFC.

Endoscopy
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Imelda Hospital (BE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.