Multi-Location Analysis of Cycling Forces and Impulses Across Posture, Cadence, and Gear Ratio

This study aimed to investigate differences in forces and impulses at five rider–bicycle contacts (bilateral grips, saddle, and bilateral pedals) across posture, cadence, and gear ratio. In a randomized, repeated-measures laboratory design, 10 male and 10 female recreational cyclists completed 18 combinations of three seated postures, three cadences, and two gear ratios on a stationary indoor bicycle sensing system (50 Hz). Three-way repeated-measures ANOVAs with Holm correction examined body-mass-normalized vertical peak force, cycle-averaged force, and impulse per cycle at p < 0.05. Posture affected all three outcomes at both grips (p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.360–0.552) but not the saddle or pedals (p = 0.821–1.000, ηp2 = 0.027–0.157). Cadence affected grip and saddle impulse and all pedal outcomes (p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.544–0.908); higher cadence reduced impulse at all contacts and increased pedal-force magnitude. Heavy gear increased all pedal outcomes and reduced all grip and saddle outcomes compared with light gear (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.593–0.981). Interactions were limited, and sensitivity analyses reproduced all main-effect conclusions. Posture effects were concentrated at the handlebar, cadence primarily modified force-time characteristics and pedal-force magnitude, and gear ratio redistributed vertical loading between the pedals and other contacts. These findings support a purpose-dependent framework for region-specific mechanical load management in comparable indoor cycling conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26206559
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Location Analysis of Cycling Forces and Impulses Across Posture, Cadence, and Gear Ratio

Philip X. Fuchs, Tzyy-Yuang Shiang, Yin-Shin Lee, Godwin Chinedu Uzomba et al.
Sensors
Sports Performance and Training
article

Multi-Location Analysis of Cycling Forces and Impulses Across Posture, Cadence, and Gear Ratio

Philip X. Fuchs, Tzyy-Yuang Shiang, Yin-Shin Lee, Godwin Chinedu Uzomba, Mengyu Chen
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate differences in forces and impulses at five rider–bicycle contacts (bilateral grips, saddle, and bilateral pedals) across posture, cadence, and gear ratio. In a randomized, repeated-measures laboratory design, 10 male and 10 female recreational cyclists completed 18 combinations of three seated postures, three cadences, and two gear ratios on a stationary indoor bicycle sensing system (50 Hz). Three-way repeated-measures ANOVAs with Holm correction examined body-mass-normalized vertical peak force, cycle-averaged force, and impulse per cycle at p < 0.05. Posture affected all three outcomes at both grips (p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.360–0.552) but not the saddle or pedals (p = 0.821–1.000, ηp2 = 0.027–0.157). Cadence affected grip and saddle impulse and all pedal outcomes (p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.544–0.908); higher cadence reduced impulse at all contacts and increased pedal-force magnitude. Heavy gear increased all pedal outcomes and reduced all grip and saddle outcomes compared with light gear (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.593–0.981). Interactions were limited, and sensitivity analyses reproduced all main-effect conclusions. Posture effects were concentrated at the handlebar, cadence primarily modified force-time characteristics and pedal-force magnitude, and gear ratio redistributed vertical loading between the pedals and other contacts. These findings support a purpose-dependent framework for region-specific mechanical load management in comparable indoor cycling conditions.

SensorsVol. 26(20)
National Taiwan Normal University (TW), Funai Electric (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.