From Diagnosis to Decision‐Making: AI ‐Driven Triage of Oral Mucosal Lesions Detected on Intraoral Photographs

BACKGROUND: Managing oral mucosal lesions in general dental practice is challenging, as visually similar conditions may require very different treatments. We developed an AI-based triage system connecting intraoral image analysis with guideline-based treatment recommendations, tested it externally, and compared its performance with clinicians' recommendations. METHODS: YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 were trained on 4079 intraoral photographs to classify 11 oral mucosal lesion types. These were mapped into five treatment tiers defined by urgency and management aim: T1 specialist referral for malignant and high-risk lesions, T2 interdisciplinary referral for specialist-led non-cancer management, T3 risk-adapted surveillance, T4 dental treatment with reassessment, and T5 no treatment. Model performance was compared with two general dentists and four specialists on an internal test set. YOLOv11 was additionally tested on an external dataset. RESULTS: YOLOv11 outperformed YOLOv8 in macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving 0.72, 0.74, and 0.73 respectively. However, 25% of T1 high-risk cases were under-triaged. YOLOv11 significantly outperformed all clinicians, whose F1 scores ranged from 0.33 to 0.69. External performance decreased markedly (F1 score: 0.58), consistent with domain shift. CONCLUSION: Guideline-oriented AI triage is feasible but requires multicentre training for improved generalizability, as well as safety-focused optimization, and prospective user evaluation before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Dental Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.70079
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Diagnosis to Decision‐Making: AI ‐Driven Triage of Oral Mucosal Lesions Detected on Intraoral Photographs

Antonín Tichý, Yoana Malenova, Ekaterina V. Tolstaya, Falk Schwendicke et al.
Australian Dental Journal
AI in cancer detection
article

From Diagnosis to Decision‐Making: AI ‐Driven Triage of Oral Mucosal Lesions Detected on Intraoral Photographs

Antonín Tichý, Yoana Malenova, Ekaterina V. Tolstaya, Falk Schwendicke, Sebastian Paris, Michael John McCullough, David Steybe, Tami Yap, Sven Otto, Julia Schwärzler
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Managing oral mucosal lesions in general dental practice is challenging, as visually similar conditions may require very different treatments. We developed an AI-based triage system connecting intraoral image analysis with guideline-based treatment recommendations, tested it externally, and compared its performance with clinicians' recommendations. METHODS: YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 were trained on 4079 intraoral photographs to classify 11 oral mucosal lesion types. These were mapped into five treatment tiers defined by urgency and management aim: T1 specialist referral for malignant and high-risk lesions, T2 interdisciplinary referral for specialist-led non-cancer management, T3 risk-adapted surveillance, T4 dental treatment with reassessment, and T5 no treatment. Model performance was compared with two general dentists and four specialists on an internal test set. YOLOv11 was additionally tested on an external dataset. RESULTS: YOLOv11 outperformed YOLOv8 in macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving 0.72, 0.74, and 0.73 respectively. However, 25% of T1 high-risk cases were under-triaged. YOLOv11 significantly outperformed all clinicians, whose F1 scores ranged from 0.33 to 0.69. External performance decreased markedly (F1 score: 0.58), consistent with domain shift. CONCLUSION: Guideline-oriented AI triage is feasible but requires multicentre training for improved generalizability, as well as safety-focused optimization, and prospective user evaluation before clinical use.

Australian Dental Journal
The University of Melbourne (AU), Charles University (CZ), LMU Klinikum (DE), General University Hospital in Prague (CZ), Istanbul Technical University (TR), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.