Assessment of the Quality of Media Reporting of the Suicide of a British Female Television Celebrity

Abstract: Background: International media guidelines aim to promote responsible reporting of suicide, acknowledging the influence of sensationalist press coverage on population suicide rates. Studies investigating guideline adherence have focused on reporting of male celebrity suicide, often demonstrating poor quality of reporting. Aims: To investigate the quality of media reporting of the suicide of a female celebrity. Method: We measured the quality of reporting in the United Kingdom (UK) on the suicide of Caroline Flack, a British television celebrity, over the 14-month period after her death using the PRINTQUAL (print content) and PRINTQUAL-web (online content). Using paired t-tests, we compared scores on the negative/poor-quality subscale and positive/good-quality subscale for each tool. Results: We identified 467 eligible news articles, the majority online ( n = 342) versus print ( n = 125), with 41% published in the week after her death, and 10% around the inquest into her death. Overall, negative/poor-quality subscale scores were significantly higher for online content than for print content, indicating poorer quality reporting for those parameters online: ( t(165.95) = 5.65; p < .001). Positive/good-quality subscale scores were also significantly higher for online content than for print content, suggesting better quality reporting for those parameters online ( t(236.46) = 8.15; p < .001). Limitations: The analysis did not include radio, television, and social media reporting of suicide. Conclusions: While online reporting showed poorer guideline adherence than print reporting in relation to potentially damaging content, online reporting was also more likely to feature positive aspects, such as inclusion of sources of information and advice. There is clear scope for the training of online and print news journalists to improve awareness of and adherence to media guidelines to mitigate negative impacts on vulnerable individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001079
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Quality of Media Reporting of the Suicide of a British Female Television Celebrity

Kangning Zheng, Ryan Jarvis, Keith E Hawton, Alexandra Pitman et al.
Crisis
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Assessment of the Quality of Media Reporting of the Suicide of a British Female Television Celebrity

Kangning Zheng, Ryan Jarvis, Keith E Hawton, Alexandra Pitman, Ágatha Alves Anet, Amanda L. Marchant, Ann Mary John, Monica Hawley
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Background: International media guidelines aim to promote responsible reporting of suicide, acknowledging the influence of sensationalist press coverage on population suicide rates. Studies investigating guideline adherence have focused on reporting of male celebrity suicide, often demonstrating poor quality of reporting. Aims: To investigate the quality of media reporting of the suicide of a female celebrity. Method: We measured the quality of reporting in the United Kingdom (UK) on the suicide of Caroline Flack, a British television celebrity, over the 14-month period after her death using the PRINTQUAL (print content) and PRINTQUAL-web (online content). Using paired t-tests, we compared scores on the negative/poor-quality subscale and positive/good-quality subscale for each tool. Results: We identified 467 eligible news articles, the majority online ( n = 342) versus print ( n = 125), with 41% published in the week after her death, and 10% around the inquest into her death. Overall, negative/poor-quality subscale scores were significantly higher for online content than for print content, indicating poorer quality reporting for those parameters online: ( t(165.95) = 5.65; p < .001). Positive/good-quality subscale scores were also significantly higher for online content than for print content, suggesting better quality reporting for those parameters online ( t(236.46) = 8.15; p < .001). Limitations: The analysis did not include radio, television, and social media reporting of suicide. Conclusions: While online reporting showed poorer guideline adherence than print reporting in relation to potentially damaging content, online reporting was also more likely to feature positive aspects, such as inclusion of sources of information and advice. There is clear scope for the training of online and print news journalists to improve awareness of and adherence to media guidelines to mitigate negative impacts on vulnerable individuals.

Crisis
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Swansea University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.