A Machine Learning Model With Temporal Validation for Predicting Walking Ability in Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND: Walking ability is the priority for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Nontraumatic SCI (NTSCI) is increasing with aging populations, yet its prognosis remains understudied. Early predictionF using admission clinical indicators could facilitate decision-making and rehabilitation planning. OBJECTIVE: To preliminarily develop and validate a machine learning model using early admission clinical indicators for predicting post-rehabilitation walking ability probability (with a classification threshold of 0.5) in patients with NTSCI. METHODS: This retrospective study included model development and temporal external validation. We enrolled 148 NTSCI patients, randomly allocating them into training (80%) and internal test (20%) sets. Four feature sets were constructed from objective clinical measures. Nine algorithms were compared; Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) was selected based on AUC, recall, and F2-score, followed by hyperparameter tuning. The final model was validated independently on a cohort of 37 NTSCI patients (July 2025 to May 2026). Ethical approval (M202616) and consent waiver obtained; retrospectively registered (MR-11-26-021748); no patient involvement. RESULTS: The GBDT-based model outperformed all others. On internal testing, it achieved an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00), recall 0.92 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00), and accuracy 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00). Key predictors included total lower limb muscle strength, age, and others. On temporal external validation, it showed encouraging performance with accuracy 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.92) and recall 0.70 (95% CI: 0.40-1.00). CONCLUSION: This preliminary model may have potential for predicting walking ability in patients with NTSCI; however, these findings are exploratory and require confirmation in larger, multicenter cohorts before any clinical application can be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261493914
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Machine Learning Model With Temporal Validation for Predicting Walking Ability in Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury

An-Ni Tong, Shuai Tong, Chen Shugeng, Jiekai Guo et al.
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

A Machine Learning Model With Temporal Validation for Predicting Walking Ability in Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury

An-Ni Tong, Shuai Tong, Chen Shugeng, Jiekai Guo, Cai Xiaoe, Wenting Wang, Mengqi Chen, Lifan Wang, Yang Gao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Walking ability is the priority for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Nontraumatic SCI (NTSCI) is increasing with aging populations, yet its prognosis remains understudied. Early predictionF using admission clinical indicators could facilitate decision-making and rehabilitation planning. OBJECTIVE: To preliminarily develop and validate a machine learning model using early admission clinical indicators for predicting post-rehabilitation walking ability probability (with a classification threshold of 0.5) in patients with NTSCI. METHODS: This retrospective study included model development and temporal external validation. We enrolled 148 NTSCI patients, randomly allocating them into training (80%) and internal test (20%) sets. Four feature sets were constructed from objective clinical measures. Nine algorithms were compared; Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) was selected based on AUC, recall, and F2-score, followed by hyperparameter tuning. The final model was validated independently on a cohort of 37 NTSCI patients (July 2025 to May 2026). Ethical approval (M202616) and consent waiver obtained; retrospectively registered (MR-11-26-021748); no patient involvement. RESULTS: The GBDT-based model outperformed all others. On internal testing, it achieved an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00), recall 0.92 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00), and accuracy 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00). Key predictors included total lower limb muscle strength, age, and others. On temporal external validation, it showed encouraging performance with accuracy 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.92) and recall 0.70 (95% CI: 0.40-1.00). CONCLUSION: This preliminary model may have potential for predicting walking ability in patients with NTSCI; however, these findings are exploratory and require confirmation in larger, multicenter cohorts before any clinical application can be considered.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
China Mobile (China) (CN), Fudan University (CN), Huashan Hospital (CN), Beijing Haidian Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.