Microsurgical resection of brain metastases: rationale, appropriateness and local control

OBJECTIVE: To summarize data on indications for microsurgical resection of brain metastases, effect of resection technique on local control and leptomeningeal dissemination, as well as the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in improving local control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive review of data on surgical treatment of brain metastases was performed. We reviewed the PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), PubMed Central, and eLIBRARY/RSCI databases between 2000 and January 2025 using the keywords "brain metastases", "en bloc resection", "piecemeal resection", "local control", "leptomeningeal disease", "preoperative SRS" and "postoperative SRS". Clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines, and consensus documents were included. Studies on primary central nervous system tumors, samples ≤10 patients, and publications without extractable clinical outcomes were excluded. RESULTS: The first part of the review considers indications for microsurgical resection in relation to clinical goals, survival and functional status. Surgery is reasonable for symptomatic large lesions, mass effect, diagnostic uncertainty, local recurrence, or complications after radiotherapy. Surgical technique should account for growth pattern of brain metastases: en bloc resection and, in selected cases, extended resection of peritumoral zone may improve local control. Retrospective data consistently associate piecemeal resection with higher risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, particularly for posterior fossa lesions and metastases adjacent to cerebrospinal fluid pathways. CONCLUSION. S: Urgical treatment is presented as a component of a personalized multimodal strategy. Decision-making on surgery should rely on survival prognosis and likelihood of clinically meaningful benefit. When technically feasible, en bloc resection may be considered as a preferable approach, especially when the risk of leptomeningeal dissemination is clinically relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Burdenko s Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro202690051106
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microsurgical resection of brain metastases: rationale, appropriateness and local control

Alexey Smolin, A. Кh. Bekyashev, С М Банов, S. R. Ilyalov et al.
Burdenko s Journal of Neurosurgery
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Microsurgical resection of brain metastases: rationale, appropriateness and local control

Alexey Smolin, A. Кh. Bekyashev, С М Банов, S. R. Ilyalov, E R Vetlova, D. A. Khalafyan, Alexander Tushev
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize data on indications for microsurgical resection of brain metastases, effect of resection technique on local control and leptomeningeal dissemination, as well as the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in improving local control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive review of data on surgical treatment of brain metastases was performed. We reviewed the PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), PubMed Central, and eLIBRARY/RSCI databases between 2000 and January 2025 using the keywords "brain metastases", "en bloc resection", "piecemeal resection", "local control", "leptomeningeal disease", "preoperative SRS" and "postoperative SRS". Clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines, and consensus documents were included. Studies on primary central nervous system tumors, samples ≤10 patients, and publications without extractable clinical outcomes were excluded. RESULTS: The first part of the review considers indications for microsurgical resection in relation to clinical goals, survival and functional status. Surgery is reasonable for symptomatic large lesions, mass effect, diagnostic uncertainty, local recurrence, or complications after radiotherapy. Surgical technique should account for growth pattern of brain metastases: en bloc resection and, in selected cases, extended resection of peritumoral zone may improve local control. Retrospective data consistently associate piecemeal resection with higher risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, particularly for posterior fossa lesions and metastases adjacent to cerebrospinal fluid pathways. CONCLUSION. S: Urgical treatment is presented as a component of a personalized multimodal strategy. Decision-making on surgery should rely on survival prognosis and likelihood of clinically meaningful benefit. When technically feasible, en bloc resection may be considered as a preferable approach, especially when the risk of leptomeningeal dissemination is clinically relevant.

Burdenko s Journal of NeurosurgeryVol. 90(5)
Rostov State Medical University (RU), Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Quadient (United Kingdom) (GB), Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.