Global origins of tuna and billfish fisheries reveal the transition from coastal access to oceanic exploitation

Ocean ecosystems have played a crucial role in people's lives around the world for millennia. However, questions persist about when, why, and how people first began removing biomass from offshore habitats and established fisheries in distant, oceanic environments. We explore the antiquity and evolution of tuna (Thunnini) and billfish (Istiophoridae/Xiphiidae) fisheries, two groups of fishes that occur around the world, are economically significant, and are ecologically important open ocean apex predators. The earliest archaeological evidence of fishing for tuna occurs ~44,000 years ago and billfish at ~10,000 years ago, with early fisheries for some tuna species appearing around the world by 3,000 to 1,000 years ago. Most early fisheries are in areas where tunas and billfishes could be accessed relatively close to shore (e.g., submarine canyons) and/or where these fishes may come inshore seasonally or during warm ocean events. Early tuna and billfish fisheries were often linked to ceremony/ritual, alongside advances in maritime technologies. With few exceptions, sustained and intensive commercial exploitation of pelagic predators in offshore and oceanic habitats is a late development in the human past, occurring primarily during the last 200 y. Our findings document a long-term continuum of human interactions with global marine ecosystems spanning thousands of years, including significant differences between the timing and pathways by which people became dominant ecological drivers in nearshore compared to offshore/oceanic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2512066123
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global origins of tuna and billfish fisheries reveal the transition from coastal access to oceanic exploitation

Torben C. Rick, Michelle J. LeFebvre, Mark Hudson, Maria José Juan‐Jordá et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
33.63
article

Global origins of tuna and billfish fisheries reveal the transition from coastal access to oceanic exploitation

Torben C. Rick, Michelle J. LeFebvre, Mark Hudson, Maria José Juan‐Jordá, Adam Jon Andrews, Eréndira M. Quintana Morales, Bonnie Newsom, Sue O’Connor, Ariana B. J. Lambrides, Marcella Festa, Thiago Fossile, Emma A. Elliott Smith, Philippe Béarez, Arthur Spiess, Claudia Zancan, Alisa Luthra, Melanie Janßen-Kim, Caitlin Zimmer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ocean ecosystems have played a crucial role in people's lives around the world for millennia. However, questions persist about when, why, and how people first began removing biomass from offshore habitats and established fisheries in distant, oceanic environments. We explore the antiquity and evolution of tuna (Thunnini) and billfish (Istiophoridae/Xiphiidae) fisheries, two groups of fishes that occur around the world, are economically significant, and are ecologically important open ocean apex predators. The earliest archaeological evidence of fishing for tuna occurs ~44,000 years ago and billfish at ~10,000 years ago, with early fisheries for some tuna species appearing around the world by 3,000 to 1,000 years ago. Most early fisheries are in areas where tunas and billfishes could be accessed relatively close to shore (e.g., submarine canyons) and/or where these fishes may come inshore seasonally or during warm ocean events. Early tuna and billfish fisheries were often linked to ceremony/ritual, alongside advances in maritime technologies. With few exceptions, sustained and intensive commercial exploitation of pelagic predators in offshore and oceanic habitats is a late development in the human past, occurring primarily during the last 200 y. Our findings document a long-term continuum of human interactions with global marine ecosystems spanning thousands of years, including significant differences between the timing and pathways by which people became dominant ecological drivers in nearshore compared to offshore/oceanic ecosystems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(43)
Smithsonian Institution (US), Australian National University (AU), Florida Museum of Natural History (US), National Museum of Natural History (US), Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), University of New Mexico (US), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), University of California System (US), Northwest University (US), Northwest University (CN), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (DE), University of Virginia (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), University of Maine (US)
Smithsonian Institution
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
33.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.