Association Between the Preoperative Modified Frailty Index-5 and Cumulative Morbidity After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the Comprehensive Complication Index

Objective: This study evaluated the association between the preoperative 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and in-hospital cumulative postoperative morbidity, as measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 455 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer between January 2015 and April 2021. Patients were classified as mFI-5 = 0, mFI-5 = 1, or mFI-5 ≥ 2. The primary outcome was high cumulative morbidity during the index hospitalization, defined as CCI ≥ 26.2. Associations with categorical outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Deviation from a linear trend was assessed using a likelihood ratio test, and sensitivity analyses were performed after excluding patients who died, restricting the analysis to elective patients, and using Firth penalized logistic regression. An exploratory interaction between categorical mFI-5 and emergency surgery was assessed using Firth penalized logistic regression. Results: Of the patients, 230 (50.5%) had mFI-5 = 0, 96 (21.1%) had mFI-5 = 1, and 129 (28.4%) had mFI-5 ≥ 2. The rates of CCI ≥ 26.2 were 17.8%, 12.5%, and 28.7%, respectively, and did not demonstrate a linear gradient across categories. Compared with mFI-5 = 0, mFI-5 ≥ 2 was associated with higher odds of CCI ≥ 26.2 after adjustment (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.21–3.89; p = 0.010), whereas no association was observed for mFI-5 = 1 (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.34–1.48; p = 0.364). A deviation from the linear trend was observed for CCI ≥ 26.2 (p = 0.025). In exploratory analyses, the adjusted OR was 2.43 (95% CI 1.30–4.54) among in-hospital survivors and 1.79 (95% CI 0.96–3.33) in the elective-only cohort. Firth analyses yielded similar results. The joint interaction test yielded p = 0.012, although the emergency subgroup contained a zero-event cell. Conclusions: mFI-5 ≥ 2 was associated with higher adjusted odds of high cumulative postoperative morbidity, whereas mFI-5 = 1 did not show an intermediate increase in risk. The non-monotonic pattern and attenuation of the association in the elective-only cohort support cautious interpretation of mFI-5 ≥ 2 as an exploratory risk indicator requiring external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15208018
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between the Preoperative Modified Frailty Index-5 and Cumulative Morbidity After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the Comprehensive Complication Index

İbrahim Coğal, İshak Aydın, Burak Aydoğan, Mevlüt Harun Ağca et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Association Between the Preoperative Modified Frailty Index-5 and Cumulative Morbidity After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the Comprehensive Complication Index

İbrahim Coğal, İshak Aydın, Burak Aydoğan, Mevlüt Harun Ağca, Orçun Yalav, Ahmet Gökhan Sarıtaş, Serdar Gümüş, Uğur Topal, İsmail Cem Eray
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the association between the preoperative 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and in-hospital cumulative postoperative morbidity, as measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 455 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer between January 2015 and April 2021. Patients were classified as mFI-5 = 0, mFI-5 = 1, or mFI-5 ≥ 2. The primary outcome was high cumulative morbidity during the index hospitalization, defined as CCI ≥ 26.2. Associations with categorical outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Deviation from a linear trend was assessed using a likelihood ratio test, and sensitivity analyses were performed after excluding patients who died, restricting the analysis to elective patients, and using Firth penalized logistic regression. An exploratory interaction between categorical mFI-5 and emergency surgery was assessed using Firth penalized logistic regression. Results: Of the patients, 230 (50.5%) had mFI-5 = 0, 96 (21.1%) had mFI-5 = 1, and 129 (28.4%) had mFI-5 ≥ 2. The rates of CCI ≥ 26.2 were 17.8%, 12.5%, and 28.7%, respectively, and did not demonstrate a linear gradient across categories. Compared with mFI-5 = 0, mFI-5 ≥ 2 was associated with higher odds of CCI ≥ 26.2 after adjustment (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.21–3.89; p = 0.010), whereas no association was observed for mFI-5 = 1 (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.34–1.48; p = 0.364). A deviation from the linear trend was observed for CCI ≥ 26.2 (p = 0.025). In exploratory analyses, the adjusted OR was 2.43 (95% CI 1.30–4.54) among in-hospital survivors and 1.79 (95% CI 0.96–3.33) in the elective-only cohort. Firth analyses yielded similar results. The joint interaction test yielded p = 0.012, although the emergency subgroup contained a zero-event cell. Conclusions: mFI-5 ≥ 2 was associated with higher adjusted odds of high cumulative postoperative morbidity, whereas mFI-5 = 1 did not show an intermediate increase in risk. The non-monotonic pattern and attenuation of the association in the elective-only cohort support cautious interpretation of mFI-5 ≥ 2 as an exploratory risk indicator requiring external validation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
Gaziantep Children's Hospital (TR), Cukurova University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.