Early PROMIS Outcomes After Cubital Tunnel Release With and Without Anterior Transposition

BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper extremity neuropathy and is treated surgically with either in situ decompression or anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. Although both approaches achieve comparable long-term outcomes, variation persists in surgical selection and reported complication rates. Limited data describe how patient characteristics, electrodiagnostic severity, and early patient-reported outcomes differ between techniques. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent cubital tunnel release between 2015 and 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior trauma, elbow surgery, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity, Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression scores were collected preoperatively and at 2-week and 6-week follow-up. Longitudinal mixed-effects regression assessed score changes, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Complications, revisions, and operative characteristics were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 1892 screened patients, 210 met inclusion criteria (147 in situ, 63 transposition). Demographics and electrodiagnostic severity were comparable, though instability was more frequent in the transposition group. Complication (0.7% vs 3.2%) and revision rates (4.1% vs 1.6%) were low, precluding statistical analysis. At 2 weeks, transposition patients demonstrated greater decline in Physical Function (-6.1) and Upper Extremity (-4.4) and increased Pain Interference (+2.9, below minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) relative to baseline, with convergence of scores between groups by 6 weeks. In situ patients had a modest decrease in pain interference scores from pre-op to six weeks post-operatively (-3.2, below MCID). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System detected transient early differences in recovery between techniques, with slower initial improvement after transposition but comparable outcomes by 6 weeks. These findings highlight PROMIS as a sensitive measure for short-term recovery and a useful tool for postoperative monitoring and patient counseling. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hand
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447261487693
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early PROMIS Outcomes After Cubital Tunnel Release With and Without Anterior Transposition

Constantinos Ketonis, Gabriel Ramı́rez, Justin Wong, Thomas John Carroll et al.
Hand
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Early PROMIS Outcomes After Cubital Tunnel Release With and Without Anterior Transposition

Constantinos Ketonis, Gabriel Ramı́rez, Justin Wong, Thomas John Carroll, Dominique Rinfret
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper extremity neuropathy and is treated surgically with either in situ decompression or anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. Although both approaches achieve comparable long-term outcomes, variation persists in surgical selection and reported complication rates. Limited data describe how patient characteristics, electrodiagnostic severity, and early patient-reported outcomes differ between techniques. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent cubital tunnel release between 2015 and 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior trauma, elbow surgery, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity, Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression scores were collected preoperatively and at 2-week and 6-week follow-up. Longitudinal mixed-effects regression assessed score changes, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Complications, revisions, and operative characteristics were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 1892 screened patients, 210 met inclusion criteria (147 in situ, 63 transposition). Demographics and electrodiagnostic severity were comparable, though instability was more frequent in the transposition group. Complication (0.7% vs 3.2%) and revision rates (4.1% vs 1.6%) were low, precluding statistical analysis. At 2 weeks, transposition patients demonstrated greater decline in Physical Function (-6.1) and Upper Extremity (-4.4) and increased Pain Interference (+2.9, below minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) relative to baseline, with convergence of scores between groups by 6 weeks. In situ patients had a modest decrease in pain interference scores from pre-op to six weeks post-operatively (-3.2, below MCID). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System detected transient early differences in recovery between techniques, with slower initial improvement after transposition but comparable outcomes by 6 weeks. These findings highlight PROMIS as a sensitive measure for short-term recovery and a useful tool for postoperative monitoring and patient counseling. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

Hand
University of Rochester Medical Center (US), University of Rochester (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.