Models for Second Courses in Data Science: Insights From Five Different Institutions

As data science continues to mature as an academic discipline, curricular standardization remains elusive. While a number of groups have defined program-level learning outcomes for data science, there is no consensus surrounding course-level learning outcomes. We present five different models for a second course in data science, each of which comes with its own learning goals, coverage of topics, points of emphasis, prerequisites, and role in our respective (statistics and) data science curricula. We use the data science topic, subtopic, and competency/concept framework created by the MASDER project to analyze the content of our courses, and present areas of similarity and difference across them. While we cannot claim that our list of courses is comprehensive, we hope that the material we present will provide other institutions and instructors with vetted ideas for second courses in data science. We also hope that our analysis can move the field towards greater coordination (and perhaps even standardization) within the data science curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard Data Science Review
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.dc87df14
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models for Second Courses in Data Science: Insights From Five Different Institutions

Leslie Myint, Gillian D. Beltz-Mohrmann, Brianna Heggeseth, Paul Roback et al.
Harvard Data Science Review
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

Models for Second Courses in Data Science: Insights From Five Different Institutions

Leslie Myint, Gillian D. Beltz-Mohrmann, Brianna Heggeseth, Paul Roback, Nicholas J. Horton, Benjamin S. Baumer, Michael A. Posner
article en

Abstract

As data science continues to mature as an academic discipline, curricular standardization remains elusive. While a number of groups have defined program-level learning outcomes for data science, there is no consensus surrounding course-level learning outcomes. We present five different models for a second course in data science, each of which comes with its own learning goals, coverage of topics, points of emphasis, prerequisites, and role in our respective (statistics and) data science curricula. We use the data science topic, subtopic, and competency/concept framework created by the MASDER project to analyze the content of our courses, and present areas of similarity and difference across them. While we cannot claim that our list of courses is comprehensive, we hope that the material we present will provide other institutions and instructors with vetted ideas for second courses in data science. We also hope that our analysis can move the field towards greater coordination (and perhaps even standardization) within the data science curriculum.

Harvard Data Science Review
Amherst College (US), Smith College (US), St. Olaf College (US), Macalester College (US), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.