Formal compliance without substantive participation: civil society and EU enlargement in Bosnia and Herzegovina

This article examines the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) following legal changes in 2017 regarding public consultations, focusing on the formal and substantive limitations to their participation in policymaking. Using the Joint Decision Trap model and Europeanization theory, the paper argues that despite external incentives and the institutionalization of public consultation mechanisms under EU pressure, civil society remains largely excluded from meaningful influence. The study is based primarily on interviews with 10 civil society and public institution representatives who actively participate in public consultations on the EU integration process, as well as data from the Ministry of Justice and entity parliaments. The findings of this article suggest that the complex institutional architecture of Bosnia, combined with the political practice of employing fast track procedures, creates conditions that exclude civil society from fulfilling its role as a meaningful contributor to enhancing transparency and improving proposed legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2745241
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formal compliance without substantive participation: civil society and EU enlargement in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adem Olovčić, Anes Makul, Zerina Kalamujić
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Formal compliance without substantive participation: civil society and EU enlargement in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adem Olovčić, Anes Makul, Zerina Kalamujić
article en

Abstract

This article examines the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) following legal changes in 2017 regarding public consultations, focusing on the formal and substantive limitations to their participation in policymaking. Using the Joint Decision Trap model and Europeanization theory, the paper argues that despite external incentives and the institutionalization of public consultation mechanisms under EU pressure, civil society remains largely excluded from meaningful influence. The study is based primarily on interviews with 10 civil society and public institution representatives who actively participate in public consultations on the EU integration process, as well as data from the Ministry of Justice and entity parliaments. The findings of this article suggest that the complex institutional architecture of Bosnia, combined with the political practice of employing fast track procedures, creates conditions that exclude civil society from fulfilling its role as a meaningful contributor to enhancing transparency and improving proposed legislation.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
University of Tuzla (BA), International Burch University (BA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.