Toward Sustainable Mechanized Production of Processing Tomatoes: Crop–Machine Interactions, Operational Trade-Offs, and Pathways for Intelligent Control

Mechanized production of processing tomatoes depends on coordinated operations, but crop variability and successive material transfers make performance strongly condition-dependent. This narrative review used structured, non-systematic literature identification across multidisciplinary databases and publisher platforms, supplemented by backward reference tracing through July 2026. Evidence was synthesized through crop–agronomy conditions, machine responses, operational trade-offs, validation maturity, sustainability-related outcomes, and downstream residue requirements. Four findings emerge. First, architecture, maturity synchronization, fruit mechanics, stand geometry, and water status define machine operating envelopes. Second, harvesting is governed by a persistent conflict among detachment, loss, damage, impurity content, throughput, and energy demand; comparisons of settings benefit from a common basis in cultivar, feed rate, machine configuration, and metric definition. Third, sensing and prediction studies provide a foundation for automatic execution and feedback-based adjustment, with replicated whole-machine field trials offering the next step in evaluating multistage control. Fourth, residue discharge, size reduction, collection, and densification need to be specified backward from soil-incorporation or valorization requirements. Operation-specific sustainability benefits are most directly supported for water and input efficiency, marketable-yield retention, and residue recovery, with matched assessments of energy, cost, and life-cycle impacts providing opportunities to extend these findings. Progress therefore requires crop-specific tests that report engineering benefits together with losses, adverse effects, resource use, and operating boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16202257
Primary Topic
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Sustainable Mechanized Production of Processing Tomatoes: Crop–Machine Interactions, Operational Trade-Offs, and Pathways for Intelligent Control

Junhao Cao, Zhong Tang, Yiheng Qian, Ruifan Tang et al.
Agriculture
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
article

Toward Sustainable Mechanized Production of Processing Tomatoes: Crop–Machine Interactions, Operational Trade-Offs, and Pathways for Intelligent Control

Junhao Cao, Zhong Tang, Yiheng Qian, Ruifan Tang, Liming Zhang, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Mechanized production of processing tomatoes depends on coordinated operations, but crop variability and successive material transfers make performance strongly condition-dependent. This narrative review used structured, non-systematic literature identification across multidisciplinary databases and publisher platforms, supplemented by backward reference tracing through July 2026. Evidence was synthesized through crop–agronomy conditions, machine responses, operational trade-offs, validation maturity, sustainability-related outcomes, and downstream residue requirements. Four findings emerge. First, architecture, maturity synchronization, fruit mechanics, stand geometry, and water status define machine operating envelopes. Second, harvesting is governed by a persistent conflict among detachment, loss, damage, impurity content, throughput, and energy demand; comparisons of settings benefit from a common basis in cultivar, feed rate, machine configuration, and metric definition. Third, sensing and prediction studies provide a foundation for automatic execution and feedback-based adjustment, with replicated whole-machine field trials offering the next step in evaluating multistage control. Fourth, residue discharge, size reduction, collection, and densification need to be specified backward from soil-incorporation or valorization requirements. Operation-specific sustainability benefits are most directly supported for water and input efficiency, marketable-yield retention, and residue recovery, with matched assessments of energy, cost, and life-cycle impacts providing opportunities to extend these findings. Progress therefore requires crop-specific tests that report engineering benefits together with losses, adverse effects, resource use, and operating boundaries.

AgricultureVol. 16(20)
Jiangsu University (CN)
Jiangsu University
Responsible consumption and production, Zero hunger, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.