Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations

Urban sustainability transformations call for fundamental shifts in how cities are organized, developed, and governed. Yet we need a better understanding of the diversity of visions and pathways that can enable transformative change. We address this gap through an analysis of 60 coproduced positive scenario visions and pathways developed using the Sustainable Future Scenario process, across nine US and Latin American cities participating in the Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network. We engaged diverse urban stakeholders-including government, nonprofit, and private decision-makers, community leaders, residents, and academic collaborators-in more than 20 coproduction workshops to explore alternative urban futures of sustainability and resilience. We examined how the coproduced scenarios represent five domains of transformative change (nature-human relationships, economic transformation, governance, social and environmental justice, and infrastructure futures) and four theories of transformative change (structural/institutional, agency/power, goals of the system, and worldviews/values). Most pathways combined multiple theories of change operating across multiple domains, revealing urban transformations as entangled rather than singular interventions. Some strategies were common across cities-car-free regions, decentralized infrastructure, community-based governance, expanded fundamental rights-yet were pursued with different transformative aims, demonstrating how a strategy's transformative intent depends on the theories of change behind it. These findings position coproduced scenarios as more than a normative or planning tool and offer an analytical approach for surfacing the possibility space of urban transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2537819123
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations

Nancy B. Grimm, Tischa A. Muñoz‐Erickson, David M. Iwaniec, Elizabeth M. Cook et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations

Nancy B. Grimm, Tischa A. Muñoz‐Erickson, David M. Iwaniec, Elizabeth M. Cook, The UREx City Scenarios Team, Marta Berbés Blázquez
article en

Abstract

Urban sustainability transformations call for fundamental shifts in how cities are organized, developed, and governed. Yet we need a better understanding of the diversity of visions and pathways that can enable transformative change. We address this gap through an analysis of 60 coproduced positive scenario visions and pathways developed using the Sustainable Future Scenario process, across nine US and Latin American cities participating in the Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network. We engaged diverse urban stakeholders-including government, nonprofit, and private decision-makers, community leaders, residents, and academic collaborators-in more than 20 coproduction workshops to explore alternative urban futures of sustainability and resilience. We examined how the coproduced scenarios represent five domains of transformative change (nature-human relationships, economic transformation, governance, social and environmental justice, and infrastructure futures) and four theories of transformative change (structural/institutional, agency/power, goals of the system, and worldviews/values). Most pathways combined multiple theories of change operating across multiple domains, revealing urban transformations as entangled rather than singular interventions. Some strategies were common across cities-car-free regions, decentralized infrastructure, community-based governance, expanded fundamental rights-yet were pursued with different transformative aims, demonstrating how a strategy's transformative intent depends on the theories of change behind it. These findings position coproduced scenarios as more than a normative or planning tool and offer an analytical approach for surfacing the possibility space of urban transformation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(42)
US Forest Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Waterloo (CA), Georgia State University (US), Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US), International Institute of Tropical Forestry (PR), Barnard College (US)
National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.