Exploring Career Competencies: An Italian Validation Study of the CCQ and Test of Its Nomological Net

Career competencies are widely acknowledged as critical self-regulatory resources for achieving career success. The measurement of career competencies has been largely confined to restricted cultural contexts, limiting theoretical development and practical application. Addressing this gap, we conducted a validation study of an Italian version of the Career Competencies Questionnaire (CCQ-I), advancing its cross-cultural applicability and positioning career competencies within the self-regulatory framework. In Study 1, we developed and validated the CCQ-I. Drawing on a sample of Italian employees ( N = 555), randomly split into two sub-samples, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to establish the factorial structure. We further tested measurement invariance, concurrent and discriminant validity. Study 2 employed a three-wave design with an independent sample of Italian employees ( N = 591). Across both studies, findings provided support for the CCQ-I’s validity, demonstrating high reliability, a stable factor structure across groups. Importantly, longitudinal results from Study 2 revealed that career competencies predict multiple facets of subjective career success, with career crafting serving as a behavioral enactment. This research extends career competencies theory by validating a culturally sensitive instrument, clarifying how career competencies contribute to career success, and providing actionable insights for scholars and practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261498888
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Career Competencies: An Italian Validation Study of the CCQ and Test of Its Nomological Net

Jos Akkermans, Alessandro Lo Presti, Assunta De Rosa, Svetlana N. Khapova
Journal of Career Assessment
Career Development and Diversity
article

Exploring Career Competencies: An Italian Validation Study of the CCQ and Test of Its Nomological Net

Jos Akkermans, Alessandro Lo Presti, Assunta De Rosa, Svetlana N. Khapova
article en

Abstract

Career competencies are widely acknowledged as critical self-regulatory resources for achieving career success. The measurement of career competencies has been largely confined to restricted cultural contexts, limiting theoretical development and practical application. Addressing this gap, we conducted a validation study of an Italian version of the Career Competencies Questionnaire (CCQ-I), advancing its cross-cultural applicability and positioning career competencies within the self-regulatory framework. In Study 1, we developed and validated the CCQ-I. Drawing on a sample of Italian employees ( N = 555), randomly split into two sub-samples, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to establish the factorial structure. We further tested measurement invariance, concurrent and discriminant validity. Study 2 employed a three-wave design with an independent sample of Italian employees ( N = 591). Across both studies, findings provided support for the CCQ-I’s validity, demonstrating high reliability, a stable factor structure across groups. Importantly, longitudinal results from Study 2 revealed that career competencies predict multiple facets of subjective career success, with career crafting serving as a behavioral enactment. This research extends career competencies theory by validating a culturally sensitive instrument, clarifying how career competencies contribute to career success, and providing actionable insights for scholars and practitioners.

Journal of Career Assessment
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.