Conceptual and translational pitfalls of modified messenger RNA drug design with public health impact

Abstract Updated safety warnings for base-modified messenger RNA (mmRNA) vaccines—such as increased risks of life-threatening myo(peri)carditis and the increased appearance of colorectal cancer in young adults—prompted our comprehensive review of this approach. Careful analysis of RNA biology textbook materials and the scientific literature identified serious conceptual, procedural, and translational issues that explain the shortcomings and potential public health risks of these injectables. The primary issues include using artificial pseudo-uridinated and methylated nucleosides based on the misleading information that these modified bases occur naturally and in sufficient numbers in eukaryotic mRNAs. In mmRNA vaccines, approximately 50% of the bases are modified with N1-methyl-pseudouridine, whereas eukaryotic mRNA typically contains a much lower percentage of pseudouridine, ranging from 0.2% to 0.6% (Ψ/U ratio), without methylation with intronic (non-coding) properties. This practice, meant to stabilize mRNA and prolong its half-life, disregards the biological safeguard of rapid natural mRNA breakdown. The modifications prevent the activation of key immune mechanisms and can lead to unwanted reverse transcription, frameshifting, and uncontrolled production of pathogenic spike proteins with an unknown pharmacological half-life. Developers also failed to consider that these structural changes could interfere with the proper function of ribonuclease L (RNase L), a critical enzyme of the innate immune system whose primary role is to degrade viral RNA and limit viral protein synthesis and replication. Furthermore, researchers often conflated the structural and functional differences between non-coding tRNA and coding mRNA as well as between pseudouridine and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications—a fundamental research error. Given these substantial unknowns and pitfalls, a second look is warranted before indiscriminately using mmRNA therapeutics in healthy populations of all ages, including pregnant women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Genomics
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-026-01061-3
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual and translational pitfalls of modified messenger RNA drug design with public health impact

Carlo Brogna, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos, Carole H. Browner, Stephanie Seneff et al.
Human Genomics
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Conceptual and translational pitfalls of modified messenger RNA drug design with public health impact

Carlo Brogna, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos, Carole H. Browner, Stephanie Seneff, Marina Piscopo, László G. Boros
article en

Abstract

Abstract Updated safety warnings for base-modified messenger RNA (mmRNA) vaccines—such as increased risks of life-threatening myo(peri)carditis and the increased appearance of colorectal cancer in young adults—prompted our comprehensive review of this approach. Careful analysis of RNA biology textbook materials and the scientific literature identified serious conceptual, procedural, and translational issues that explain the shortcomings and potential public health risks of these injectables. The primary issues include using artificial pseudo-uridinated and methylated nucleosides based on the misleading information that these modified bases occur naturally and in sufficient numbers in eukaryotic mRNAs. In mmRNA vaccines, approximately 50% of the bases are modified with N1-methyl-pseudouridine, whereas eukaryotic mRNA typically contains a much lower percentage of pseudouridine, ranging from 0.2% to 0.6% (Ψ/U ratio), without methylation with intronic (non-coding) properties. This practice, meant to stabilize mRNA and prolong its half-life, disregards the biological safeguard of rapid natural mRNA breakdown. The modifications prevent the activation of key immune mechanisms and can lead to unwanted reverse transcription, frameshifting, and uncontrolled production of pathogenic spike proteins with an unknown pharmacological half-life. Developers also failed to consider that these structural changes could interfere with the proper function of ribonuclease L (RNase L), a critical enzyme of the innate immune system whose primary role is to degrade viral RNA and limit viral protein synthesis and replication. Furthermore, researchers often conflated the structural and functional differences between non-coding tRNA and coding mRNA as well as between pseudouridine and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications—a fundamental research error. Given these substantial unknowns and pitfalls, a second look is warranted before indiscriminately using mmRNA therapeutics in healthy populations of all ages, including pregnant women.

Human Genomics
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Patras (GR), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US), MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.