Exploring Romanian Misinformation with GraphRAG: Community-Level Narratives of COVID-19

Predefined thematic taxonomies can obscure how misinformation narratives emerge, overlap, and change over time. One way to address this limitation is by developing bottom-up data-driven approaches that identify narratives directly from data. We present a pipeline that extracts entities and relations from news articles using GraphRAG, identifies communities using the Leiden algorithm, and uses this information to explore and predict misinformation. We evaluate the pipeline on a set of Romanian COVID-19 pandemic news articles with expert-defined narrative annotations and adapt the extraction prompts to Romanian. Exploratory results show that in this corpus, the graph for fake news is more fragmented and less modular than the graph for real news; it also contains higher proportions of events, disinformation theory, and vaccine entities, whereas the real-news graph contains higher proportions of locations, hospitals, and public health measures. Communities in the combined graph align weakly with the predefined super-narrative labels, indicating that the two representations group articles differently. Furthermore, expert review of similar articles from communities identified within the combined real–fake graph suggests that an approach based on entity and community may offer a promising avenue for identifying subtle misinformation strategies. Regarding the prediction task, a three-component ensemble that uses graph information achieves 85.86% macro-F1 (95% CI [78.50, 91.27]) and 86.51% accuracy (95% CI [78.57, 91.27]) on classifying articles as fake or true. These point estimates suggest incremental gains over the two-component ensemble without the graph similarity signal, though these gains are not statistically confirmed at this sample size. Together, these exploratory results illustrate the use of GraphRAG as a tool in pipelines that support the exploration and prediction of misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7100429
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Romanian Misinformation with GraphRAG: Community-Level Narratives of COVID-19

Simina-Maria Terian, Mihai Dascălu, Alexandra Ispas, Denis Iorga
AI
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Exploring Romanian Misinformation with GraphRAG: Community-Level Narratives of COVID-19

Simina-Maria Terian, Mihai Dascălu, Alexandra Ispas, Denis Iorga
article en

Abstract

Predefined thematic taxonomies can obscure how misinformation narratives emerge, overlap, and change over time. One way to address this limitation is by developing bottom-up data-driven approaches that identify narratives directly from data. We present a pipeline that extracts entities and relations from news articles using GraphRAG, identifies communities using the Leiden algorithm, and uses this information to explore and predict misinformation. We evaluate the pipeline on a set of Romanian COVID-19 pandemic news articles with expert-defined narrative annotations and adapt the extraction prompts to Romanian. Exploratory results show that in this corpus, the graph for fake news is more fragmented and less modular than the graph for real news; it also contains higher proportions of events, disinformation theory, and vaccine entities, whereas the real-news graph contains higher proportions of locations, hospitals, and public health measures. Communities in the combined graph align weakly with the predefined super-narrative labels, indicating that the two representations group articles differently. Furthermore, expert review of similar articles from communities identified within the combined real–fake graph suggests that an approach based on entity and community may offer a promising avenue for identifying subtle misinformation strategies. Regarding the prediction task, a three-component ensemble that uses graph information achieves 85.86% macro-F1 (95% CI [78.50, 91.27]) and 86.51% accuracy (95% CI [78.57, 91.27]) on classifying articles as fake or true. These point estimates suggest incremental gains over the two-component ensemble without the graph similarity signal, though these gains are not statistically confirmed at this sample size. Together, these exploratory results illustrate the use of GraphRAG as a tool in pipelines that support the exploration and prediction of misinformation.

AIVol. 7(10)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.