Adaptive Tracking Control for Underactuated Lunar Hopping Vehicles

This paper develops two different adaptive control solutions for a propulsive exploration lunar hopping vehicle along with their performance characterization. Full six-degree-of-freedom error dynamics relative to an a priori defined reference trajectory are outlined for controller derivation. A certainty equivalence adaptive controller and a noncertainty equivalence adaptive controller are derived utilizing a baseline backstepping design to handle the lunar hopping vehicle’s inherent underactuated dynamics. The flight and landing requirements are evaluated for both controllers to compare and critically evaluate their relative performance features. The noncertainty equivalence adaptive estimate exhibits more desirable behavior than the certainty equivalence adaptive estimate at the cost of additional filtered states to compute. Overall, both controllers satisfy the flight and landing requirements, with the noncertainty equivalence controller achieving better landing criteria by nearly [Formula: see text] across all landing requirements and more desirable parameter estimation behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a36655
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Tracking Control for Underactuated Lunar Hopping Vehicles

Maruthi Ram Akella, Andrew Jeffrey Miller, Chris J. Busic, Wyatt Johnson
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
article

Adaptive Tracking Control for Underactuated Lunar Hopping Vehicles

Maruthi Ram Akella, Andrew Jeffrey Miller, Chris J. Busic, Wyatt Johnson
article en

Abstract

This paper develops two different adaptive control solutions for a propulsive exploration lunar hopping vehicle along with their performance characterization. Full six-degree-of-freedom error dynamics relative to an a priori defined reference trajectory are outlined for controller derivation. A certainty equivalence adaptive controller and a noncertainty equivalence adaptive controller are derived utilizing a baseline backstepping design to handle the lunar hopping vehicle’s inherent underactuated dynamics. The flight and landing requirements are evaluated for both controllers to compare and critically evaluate their relative performance features. The noncertainty equivalence adaptive estimate exhibits more desirable behavior than the certainty equivalence adaptive estimate at the cost of additional filtered states to compute. Overall, both controllers satisfy the flight and landing requirements, with the noncertainty equivalence controller achieving better landing criteria by nearly [Formula: see text] across all landing requirements and more desirable parameter estimation behavior.

Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.