Testing Group Differences in Nonlinear Growth Curve Modeling with Penalized Spline

Longitudinal data analysis in social and behavioral sciences often assumes a linear change over time, but human behavior is complex and frequently exhibits nonlinear patterns. Regression spline is a popular approach in machine learning to model nonlinear trajectories. While traditional machine learning prioritizes prediction, researchers in social and behavioral sciences focus on testing and interpreting the significance of group differences. This study compares six spline models for evaluating group differences in group-mean trajectories across multiple time points: the frequentist truncated power basis model, the frequentist piecewise basis model, the frequentist B-spline basis model, the Bayesian truncated power basis model, the Bayesian piecewise basis model, and the Bayesian B-spline basis model. Through simulation, we found that for non-censored data, the frequentist models demonstrated stability and robust performance. However, these models showed potential issues with statistical inference such as coverage rates and Type I error rates when the data are censored (e.g., floor and ceiling effects). For the latter cases, we recommend either using the frequentist models with an unstructured level-2 covariance matrix if computation time permits, or using the Bayesian B-spline model with an unstructured level-2 covariance matrix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2026.2728649
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Group Differences in Nonlinear Growth Curve Modeling with Penalized Spline

Han Du, Zhiyong Zhang, Liu Yang
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Testing Group Differences in Nonlinear Growth Curve Modeling with Penalized Spline

Han Du, Zhiyong Zhang, Liu Yang
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal data analysis in social and behavioral sciences often assumes a linear change over time, but human behavior is complex and frequently exhibits nonlinear patterns. Regression spline is a popular approach in machine learning to model nonlinear trajectories. While traditional machine learning prioritizes prediction, researchers in social and behavioral sciences focus on testing and interpreting the significance of group differences. This study compares six spline models for evaluating group differences in group-mean trajectories across multiple time points: the frequentist truncated power basis model, the frequentist piecewise basis model, the frequentist B-spline basis model, the Bayesian truncated power basis model, the Bayesian piecewise basis model, and the Bayesian B-spline basis model. Through simulation, we found that for non-censored data, the frequentist models demonstrated stability and robust performance. However, these models showed potential issues with statistical inference such as coverage rates and Type I error rates when the data are censored (e.g., floor and ceiling effects). For the latter cases, we recommend either using the frequentist models with an unstructured level-2 covariance matrix if computation time permits, or using the Bayesian B-spline model with an unstructured level-2 covariance matrix.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
University of Notre Dame (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.