Mowing meadows without conditioner and the availability of bee-friendly habitats synergistically benefit wild bees in agricultural landscapes

Healthy populations of wild bees are essential for the pollination of wild plants and many crops. However, wild bees are under pressure, in particular due to the intensification of agriculture. To counteract negative effects, mitigation measures are being implemented via agri-environment schemes. While agricultural meadows offer valuable floral food resources for bees, the technique and timing of their harvesting are likely critical aspects determining their value for pollinators. Early mowing before or during peak flowering and the use of conditioners, devices commonly used to accelerate grass drying and increase feed quality, could negatively affect bees. Over a period of six years, we sampled wild bees in 74 landscapes in western Switzerland differing in conditioner use in ley- and permanent meadows as well as delayed mowing of ley meadows to investigate the individual and combined impacts of these measures on wild bees. We found that refraining from conditioner use in extensively managed permanent meadows in combination with increased proportions of bee-friendly habitats synergistically benefitted overall wild bee abundance and richness as well as bumblebee abundance. Moreover, to benefit bumblebees, the share of no conditioner use needed to be high in both, leys and intensively managed permanent meadows. There was, however, substantial variation of the effects of the measures between years, emphasizing the need for long-term monitoring of such measures to better understand their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2026.110796
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mowing meadows without conditioner and the availability of bee-friendly habitats synergistically benefit wild bees in agricultural landscapes

Christophe J. Praz, Yann‐David Varennes, Louis Sutter, Janine Melanie Schwarz et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant and animal studies
article

Mowing meadows without conditioner and the availability of bee-friendly habitats synergistically benefit wild bees in agricultural landscapes

Christophe J. Praz, Yann‐David Varennes, Louis Sutter, Janine Melanie Schwarz, Matthias Albrecht, Matthias Suter, Stephanie Pettman
article en

Abstract

Healthy populations of wild bees are essential for the pollination of wild plants and many crops. However, wild bees are under pressure, in particular due to the intensification of agriculture. To counteract negative effects, mitigation measures are being implemented via agri-environment schemes. While agricultural meadows offer valuable floral food resources for bees, the technique and timing of their harvesting are likely critical aspects determining their value for pollinators. Early mowing before or during peak flowering and the use of conditioners, devices commonly used to accelerate grass drying and increase feed quality, could negatively affect bees. Over a period of six years, we sampled wild bees in 74 landscapes in western Switzerland differing in conditioner use in ley- and permanent meadows as well as delayed mowing of ley meadows to investigate the individual and combined impacts of these measures on wild bees. We found that refraining from conditioner use in extensively managed permanent meadows in combination with increased proportions of bee-friendly habitats synergistically benefitted overall wild bee abundance and richness as well as bumblebee abundance. Moreover, to benefit bumblebees, the share of no conditioner use needed to be high in both, leys and intensively managed permanent meadows. There was, however, substantial variation of the effects of the measures between years, emphasizing the need for long-term monitoring of such measures to better understand their effectiveness.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 414
Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), info fauna (CH), University of Neuchâtel (CH)
Life on land, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.