Maintaining Access to Essential Health Technologies in Conflict-Affected Settings: Calibrating Security-Sensitive Transfer Controls

This study examines how armed conflict disrupts the conditions needed to implement security-sensitive transfer controls on essential health technologies. It maps selected technologies against Australia Group control lists, EU Regulation 2021/821 and IAEA guidance on the import and export of radioactive sources. The analysis covers classification, authorisation, end-use verification, transport, lifecycle support and post-delivery accountability. The Wassenaar Arrangement and Chemical Weapons Convention provide comparative frameworks. Examples from Gaza and Ukraine illustrate different challenges affecting access to diagnostic equipment and continuity of cancer care. They are used as contextual illustrations, not country-based comparative case studies. The study finds that differentiated control mechanisms already exist, but armed conflict may weaken the institutional, regulatory and verification conditions needed to apply them. It identifies practical priorities for strengthening existing procedures while preserving security safeguards and access to essential healthcare. Scientific poster prepared for Geneva Health Forum 2026, Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23412899
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintaining Access to Essential Health Technologies in Conflict-Affected Settings: Calibrating Security-Sensitive Transfer Controls

shiva Rezaeifar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Health and Conflict Studies
article

Maintaining Access to Essential Health Technologies in Conflict-Affected Settings: Calibrating Security-Sensitive Transfer Controls

shiva Rezaeifar
article en

Abstract

This study examines how armed conflict disrupts the conditions needed to implement security-sensitive transfer controls on essential health technologies. It maps selected technologies against Australia Group control lists, EU Regulation 2021/821 and IAEA guidance on the import and export of radioactive sources. The analysis covers classification, authorisation, end-use verification, transport, lifecycle support and post-delivery accountability. The Wassenaar Arrangement and Chemical Weapons Convention provide comparative frameworks. Examples from Gaza and Ukraine illustrate different challenges affecting access to diagnostic equipment and continuity of cancer care. They are used as contextual illustrations, not country-based comparative case studies. The study finds that differentiated control mechanisms already exist, but armed conflict may weaken the institutional, regulatory and verification conditions needed to apply them. It identifies practical priorities for strengthening existing procedures while preserving security safeguards and access to essential healthcare. Scientific poster prepared for Geneva Health Forum 2026, Geneva, Switzerland.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Liège (BE)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health and Conflict Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.