Explaining Drawdowns: An ADCC Framework for Communicating Losses with Clarity and Trust

Drawdowns are among the most emotionally charged moments in portfolio management‚ yet the language that advisers use to explain them to clients is often improvised and counterproductive. This article develops a four-step framework, ADCC (acknowledge, diagnose, contextualize, commit) to help communicate peak-to-trough losses in a way that is technically accurate, psychologically attentive, and easy to understand. We start by defining key drawdown concepts and classifying drawdowns into four types: systematic, strategy-specific, factor/style, and idiosyncratic. Next, we outline and illustrate four recurring communication failures: obfuscation, normalization, blame-shifting, and the forecast trap. Finally, we show how the ADCC framework can be adapted for three settings: individual client conversations, investment committee presentations, and written disclosures. We conclude with recommendations for implementation and suggestions for future research on how improved drawdown communication may affect client trust and retention. The framework is intended as a practical communication tool and as a foundation for future empirical research on how drawdown explanations shape investor understanding and trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2026.079
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining Drawdowns: An ADCC Framework for Communicating Losses with Clarity and Trust

François‐Serge Lhabitant
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Explaining Drawdowns: An ADCC Framework for Communicating Losses with Clarity and Trust

François‐Serge Lhabitant
article en

Abstract

Drawdowns are among the most emotionally charged moments in portfolio management‚ yet the language that advisers use to explain them to clients is often improvised and counterproductive. This article develops a four-step framework, ADCC (acknowledge, diagnose, contextualize, commit) to help communicate peak-to-trough losses in a way that is technically accurate, psychologically attentive, and easy to understand. We start by defining key drawdown concepts and classifying drawdowns into four types: systematic, strategy-specific, factor/style, and idiosyncratic. Next, we outline and illustrate four recurring communication failures: obfuscation, normalization, blame-shifting, and the forecast trap. Finally, we show how the ADCC framework can be adapted for three settings: individual client conversations, investment committee presentations, and written disclosures. We conclude with recommendations for implementation and suggestions for future research on how improved drawdown communication may affect client trust and retention. The framework is intended as a practical communication tool and as a foundation for future empirical research on how drawdown explanations shape investor understanding and trust.

The Journal of Portfolio Management
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.