Turbidity Spikes: Fact or Fiction?

High‐frequency turbidity monitoring often reveals short‐duration spikes that may not reflect actual particulate events, creating challenges for accurate interpretation. A practical analytical approach can help distinguish true turbidity excursions from false positives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Opflow
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/opfl.70134
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbidity Spikes: Fact or Fiction?

Mike Sadar, Zhao Lu
Opflow
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
article

Turbidity Spikes: Fact or Fiction?

Mike Sadar, Zhao Lu
article en

Abstract

High‐frequency turbidity monitoring often reveals short‐duration spikes that may not reflect actual particulate events, creating challenges for accurate interpretation. A practical analytical approach can help distinguish true turbidity excursions from false positives.

OpflowVol. 52(9)
Office of the Chief Scientist (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.