Prognostic Significance of Contrast Enhancement in Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 IDH-mutant Glioma

BACKGROUND: Contrast enhancement is generally considered an adverse prognostic feature in adult glioma. However, its significance in newly diagnosed grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma remains uncertain, with important implications for use of the mutant IDH inhibitor vorasidenib. We evaluated survival outcomes associated with preoperative enhancement in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma treated at two institutions between 2010 and 2021. Preoperative MRIs were assessed for intratumoral enhancement by two independent readers with third-reader adjudication. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 325 evaluable patients, median age was 37 years, 47% had 1p/19q-codeletion, and 35% had gross-total resection. Median follow-up was 10.5 years. Preoperative enhancement was observed in 53 (16%) patients, most commonly nonmeasurable (72%) or ill-defined (62%); most (87%) had no residual postoperative enhancement. Preoperative enhancement was not associated with OS or PFS in either univariate analyses (OS HR 1.16 [0.67-2.01], p = 0.591; PFS HR 1.25 [0.88-1.80], p = 0.216) or multivariable analyses adjusting for established prognostic factors (OS HR 0.86 [0.46-1.61], p = 0.633; PFS HR 1.29 [0.86-1.92], p = 0.219). Enhancement characteristics (measurable size, well-defined morphology) were not associated with OS. CONCLUSION: In grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, preoperative enhancement was not associated with OS or PFS. These findings suggest that preoperative enhancement does not identify a higher-risk subgroup in this population, and that its presence alone should not preclude consideration of vorasidenib in eligible patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag262
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Significance of Contrast Enhancement in Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 IDH-mutant Glioma

Loai J. A. Aker, Tamar R. Berger, Julie J. Miller, John Yohan Rhee et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prognostic Significance of Contrast Enhancement in Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 IDH-mutant Glioma

Loai J. A. Aker, Tamar R. Berger, Julie J. Miller, John Yohan Rhee, Lakshmi Nayak, Patrick Yung Wen, Isabel Arrillaga‐Romany, Gilbert Youssef, Aleksandra B Lasica, Jason Lauer, Eudocia Q. Lee, Vihang Nakhate, Elisa Aquilanti, Julien Rousseau, Ian Pan, Jörg Dietrich, Ugonma Nnenna Chukwueke, Scott Randall Plotkin, David A. Reardon, Raymond Y. Huang, Tracy T. Batchelor, Deborah Anne Forst, Elizabeth Robins Gerstner, Nancy Wang, Rameen Beroukhim, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast enhancement is generally considered an adverse prognostic feature in adult glioma. However, its significance in newly diagnosed grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma remains uncertain, with important implications for use of the mutant IDH inhibitor vorasidenib. We evaluated survival outcomes associated with preoperative enhancement in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma treated at two institutions between 2010 and 2021. Preoperative MRIs were assessed for intratumoral enhancement by two independent readers with third-reader adjudication. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 325 evaluable patients, median age was 37 years, 47% had 1p/19q-codeletion, and 35% had gross-total resection. Median follow-up was 10.5 years. Preoperative enhancement was observed in 53 (16%) patients, most commonly nonmeasurable (72%) or ill-defined (62%); most (87%) had no residual postoperative enhancement. Preoperative enhancement was not associated with OS or PFS in either univariate analyses (OS HR 1.16 [0.67-2.01], p = 0.591; PFS HR 1.25 [0.88-1.80], p = 0.216) or multivariable analyses adjusting for established prognostic factors (OS HR 0.86 [0.46-1.61], p = 0.633; PFS HR 1.29 [0.86-1.92], p = 0.219). Enhancement characteristics (measurable size, well-defined morphology) were not associated with OS. CONCLUSION: In grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, preoperative enhancement was not associated with OS or PFS. These findings suggest that preoperative enhancement does not identify a higher-risk subgroup in this population, and that its presence alone should not preclude consideration of vorasidenib in eligible patients.

Neuro-Oncology
Harvard University (US), Center for Neuro-Oncology (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.