The Evolution of Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Past Achievements, Current Standards, and Future Perspectives

Neoadjuvant treatment has become an integral component of multidisciplinary management for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Over recent decades, treatment has evolved from surgery alone to postoperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intensified systemic therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and, more recently, the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into curative-intent treatment. This evolution has been driven by persistent challenges including systemic recurrence, locoregional failure, treatment-related toxicity, and heterogeneous treatment response. This review traces the evolution of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable ESCC through landmark clinical trials that have shaped current practice. We discuss the transition from postoperative to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the development of intensified chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the emergence of immunotherapy, distinguishing the established role of adjuvant nivolumab from the emerging role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. We then examine the unresolved relative roles of these strategies and the challenges in treatment selection. Finally, we discuss future directions centered on accurate response assessment, circulating tumor DNA-based molecular residual disease assessment, and response-adapted treatment, with particular emphasis on organ-preserving strategies after a clinical complete response. Although active surveillance has emerged as a potential alternative to immediate surgery in carefully selected patients, accurate identification of residual disease and appropriate surveillance remain essential. Future advances may therefore shift the focus from treatment intensification alone toward response-adapted strategies that can maintain oncological safety while potentially enabling organ preservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18203350
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Past Achievements, Current Standards, and Future Perspectives

Yohei Ozawa, Chiaki Sato, Hirotaka Ishida, Takashi Kamei et al.
Cancers
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

The Evolution of Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Past Achievements, Current Standards, and Future Perspectives

Yohei Ozawa, Chiaki Sato, Hirotaka Ishida, Takashi Kamei, Michiaki Unno, Yusuke Taniyama, Naoto Ujiie, Hiroshi Okamoto
article en

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment has become an integral component of multidisciplinary management for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Over recent decades, treatment has evolved from surgery alone to postoperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intensified systemic therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and, more recently, the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into curative-intent treatment. This evolution has been driven by persistent challenges including systemic recurrence, locoregional failure, treatment-related toxicity, and heterogeneous treatment response. This review traces the evolution of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable ESCC through landmark clinical trials that have shaped current practice. We discuss the transition from postoperative to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the development of intensified chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the emergence of immunotherapy, distinguishing the established role of adjuvant nivolumab from the emerging role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. We then examine the unresolved relative roles of these strategies and the challenges in treatment selection. Finally, we discuss future directions centered on accurate response assessment, circulating tumor DNA-based molecular residual disease assessment, and response-adapted treatment, with particular emphasis on organ-preserving strategies after a clinical complete response. Although active surveillance has emerged as a potential alternative to immediate surgery in carefully selected patients, accurate identification of residual disease and appropriate surveillance remain essential. Future advances may therefore shift the focus from treatment intensification alone toward response-adapted strategies that can maintain oncological safety while potentially enabling organ preservation.

CancersVol. 18(20)
Tohoku University (JP), Tohoku University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.