Point/Counterpoint on the Controversial 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

The 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) issued nutrition recommendations, some of which have been praised by the nutrition community while others have been questioned based on the lack of supporting evidence. The recommendations about calorie control, emphasis on nutrient density, vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, and limiting added sugars, sodium, and alcohol are based on strong evidence and have been carried forward from previous DGAs. The recommendations to limit ultra-processed foods and added sugars both per meal and per product have been well-received. The controversial recommendations relate to the type of fat recommended (e.g., "healthy" fats that include butter and beef tallow) and the omission of guidance about seed oils high in unsaturated fatty acids, notably polyunsaturated fatty acids. The food-based guidance (consuming full-fat dairy products, butter and beef tallow, and animal products such as red meat) does not align with the long-standing recommendation to limit saturated fat to < 10% of calories. Concerns have also been expressed about the higher protein recommendation as well as the recommendation to consume 20 g (or more) with each meal. Moreover, there are questions about the placement of animal foods at the top and whole grains at the bottom of the new "food pyramid". Herein we summarize the evidence in support of, and in disagreement with, the controversial new DGAs. Global dietary recommendations both in support of and not in alignment with some of the DGAs are reviewed. Strategies for widespread adoption of the DGAs are mentioned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lipids
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lipd.70088
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point/Counterpoint on the Controversial 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

James Thomas Brenna, Yan Ning Li, Penny M. Kris‐Etherton, Philip C. Calder
Lipids
Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
article

Point/Counterpoint on the Controversial 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

James Thomas Brenna, Yan Ning Li, Penny M. Kris‐Etherton, Philip C. Calder
article en

Abstract

The 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) issued nutrition recommendations, some of which have been praised by the nutrition community while others have been questioned based on the lack of supporting evidence. The recommendations about calorie control, emphasis on nutrient density, vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, and limiting added sugars, sodium, and alcohol are based on strong evidence and have been carried forward from previous DGAs. The recommendations to limit ultra-processed foods and added sugars both per meal and per product have been well-received. The controversial recommendations relate to the type of fat recommended (e.g., "healthy" fats that include butter and beef tallow) and the omission of guidance about seed oils high in unsaturated fatty acids, notably polyunsaturated fatty acids. The food-based guidance (consuming full-fat dairy products, butter and beef tallow, and animal products such as red meat) does not align with the long-standing recommendation to limit saturated fat to < 10% of calories. Concerns have also been expressed about the higher protein recommendation as well as the recommendation to consume 20 g (or more) with each meal. Moreover, there are questions about the placement of animal foods at the top and whole grains at the bottom of the new "food pyramid". Herein we summarize the evidence in support of, and in disagreement with, the controversial new DGAs. Global dietary recommendations both in support of and not in alignment with some of the DGAs are reviewed. Strategies for widespread adoption of the DGAs are mentioned.

Lipids
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Southampton (GB), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Good health and well-being, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.