Authenticity, appropriation, or alienation?: how criminologists approach employability in their degrees

This article examines how criminology educators in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand understand, incorporate or reject employability skills in their teaching. Drawing on survey data from 176 criminology educators and follow-up interviews with 40 participants, we identify both shared commitments and sharp divergences in views about the role of employability in criminology curricula. Our findings suggest that criminologists’ practices reflect different attempts to appropriate, rather than merely comply with, institutional demands. The ways criminologists articulate and negotiate their teaching responsibilities in relation to employability are shaped by deeper normative and ontological commitments. Employability is not rejected or accepted wholesale, but reworked in ways that reflect educators’ normative commitments, creating space for both critical pedagogy and pragmatic responsiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Work
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2026.2749124
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authenticity, appropriation, or alienation?: how criminologists approach employability in their degrees

Mark A. Wood, Jessamy Gleeson, Rachel Loney-Howes, Mary Iliadis et al.
Journal of Education and Work
Higher Education and Employability
article

Authenticity, appropriation, or alienation?: how criminologists approach employability in their degrees

Mark A. Wood, Jessamy Gleeson, Rachel Loney-Howes, Mary Iliadis, Samantha Keene, Kate Hutton Burns
article en

Abstract

This article examines how criminology educators in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand understand, incorporate or reject employability skills in their teaching. Drawing on survey data from 176 criminology educators and follow-up interviews with 40 participants, we identify both shared commitments and sharp divergences in views about the role of employability in criminology curricula. Our findings suggest that criminologists’ practices reflect different attempts to appropriate, rather than merely comply with, institutional demands. The ways criminologists articulate and negotiate their teaching responsibilities in relation to employability are shaped by deeper normative and ontological commitments. Employability is not rejected or accepted wholesale, but reworked in ways that reflect educators’ normative commitments, creating space for both critical pedagogy and pragmatic responsiveness.

Journal of Education and Work
Deakin University (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.