Neuroendoscopic‐Assisted vs. Conventional Burr‐Hole Drainage for Septated Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Comparative Cohort Study on Efficacy and Long‐Term Functional Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is prevalent in the elderly. Its septated variant poses a significant surgical challenge, as conventional burr-hole drainage often yields suboptimal results due to incomplete evacuation. Neuroendoscopy has emerged as a potential solution, but robust comparative evidence is lacking. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 100 patients with radiologically confirmed septated CSDH. Fifty-two underwent neuroendoscopic-assisted evacuation (Endoscopic Group), and 48 underwent conventional burr-hole drainage (Burr-Hole Group). We compared intraoperative metrics (operative time, blood loss, irrigation volume, hematoma evacuation rate), drainage duration, recurrence, and neurological/functional outcomes (mRS, NIHSS, ADL, GOS) at 6 months. RESULTS: The Endoscopic Group demonstrated a significantly higher hematoma evacuation rate (89.96% vs. 81.64%, p < 0.001) with substantially less irrigation fluid (587 vs. 1538 mL, p < 0.001), despite a longer operative time (68.34 vs. 47.52 min, p < 0.001). The endoscopic approach also led to shorter drainage retention (median 1.0 vs. 2.0 days, p < 0.001) and a significantly reduced recurrence rate (0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.010). At 6 months, the Endoscopic Group showed superior outcomes, evidenced by more favorable mRS distributions (p = 0.004), lower NIHSS scores (7.42 vs. 8.26, p = 0.006), higher ADL scores (92.78 vs. 84.45, p < 0.001), and better GOS ratings (p = 0.014). Overall complication rates were comparable (5.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.134). CONCLUSION: Neuroendoscopic-assisted burr-hole evacuation is a highly effective strategy with a favorable safety profile for septated CSDH. By ensuring more complete evacuation via direct septal disruption, this technique facilitates faster recovery, significantly lowers recurrence, and improves long-term functional outcomes, justifying the longer operative time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.71008
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuroendoscopic‐Assisted vs. Conventional Burr‐Hole Drainage for Septated Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Comparative Cohort Study on Efficacy and Long‐Term Functional Outcomes

Xinyun Ye, Wentao Lai, Guanlin Huang, Jing Hu et al.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
article

Neuroendoscopic‐Assisted vs. Conventional Burr‐Hole Drainage for Septated Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Comparative Cohort Study on Efficacy and Long‐Term Functional Outcomes

Xinyun Ye, Wentao Lai, Guanlin Huang, Jing Hu, Chuanyun Liu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is prevalent in the elderly. Its septated variant poses a significant surgical challenge, as conventional burr-hole drainage often yields suboptimal results due to incomplete evacuation. Neuroendoscopy has emerged as a potential solution, but robust comparative evidence is lacking. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 100 patients with radiologically confirmed septated CSDH. Fifty-two underwent neuroendoscopic-assisted evacuation (Endoscopic Group), and 48 underwent conventional burr-hole drainage (Burr-Hole Group). We compared intraoperative metrics (operative time, blood loss, irrigation volume, hematoma evacuation rate), drainage duration, recurrence, and neurological/functional outcomes (mRS, NIHSS, ADL, GOS) at 6 months. RESULTS: The Endoscopic Group demonstrated a significantly higher hematoma evacuation rate (89.96% vs. 81.64%, p < 0.001) with substantially less irrigation fluid (587 vs. 1538 mL, p < 0.001), despite a longer operative time (68.34 vs. 47.52 min, p < 0.001). The endoscopic approach also led to shorter drainage retention (median 1.0 vs. 2.0 days, p < 0.001) and a significantly reduced recurrence rate (0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.010). At 6 months, the Endoscopic Group showed superior outcomes, evidenced by more favorable mRS distributions (p = 0.004), lower NIHSS scores (7.42 vs. 8.26, p = 0.006), higher ADL scores (92.78 vs. 84.45, p < 0.001), and better GOS ratings (p = 0.014). Overall complication rates were comparable (5.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.134). CONCLUSION: Neuroendoscopic-assisted burr-hole evacuation is a highly effective strategy with a favorable safety profile for septated CSDH. By ensuring more complete evacuation via direct septal disruption, this technique facilitates faster recovery, significantly lowers recurrence, and improves long-term functional outcomes, justifying the longer operative time.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
Ganzhou People's Hospital (CN), Yuxian People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.